Not sure why the parties’ briefs aren’t up there…..
68162-1 – Swinomish Indian Tribal Community, Appellant v Washington State Dept. of Ecology, et al, Respondents
off-reservation treaty fishing rights
Update in People of Mich. v. Jensen — 2007 Consent Decree Motions re Exclusive Tribal Court Jurisdiction
Here is the State’s response to the Sault Tribe’s motion to enjoin the state prosecution of its members for treaty fishing violations:
And an amicus brief supporting the state prosecution:
25th Anniversary of Voigt Decision in Wisconsin
From the Wisconsin State Journal:
Northern Wisconsin marks an anniversary this year, but not everyone is celebrating. It involves 19th century Indian treaties that brought walleyes, fork-like spears, rock-throwing protesters and claims of racism to the forefront.
Twenty-five years ago, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago affirmed that Chippewa Indian tribes retained off-reservation fishing and hunting rights in 1837 and 1842 treaties that ceded millions of acres of what is now the northern third of Wisconsin to the U.S. government.
It led to a revival of an ancient Chippewa practice — spearing spawning walleyes from lakes in the spring — and led to fears from hook-and-line anglers that the fisheries would be ruined by a fishing method they claimed wasn’t sporting at all.
Turtle Talk 