Here:
Stockbridge CA2 En Banc Denial
The petition is here.
Here are the materials in Cayuga Indian Nation v. Seneca County:
The syllabus:
Appeal from a district court order preliminarily enjoining Seneca County from foreclosing upon certain parcels of the Cayuga Indian Nation of New York’s real property to satisfy unpaid ad valorem property taxes. We conclude, in light of recent Supreme Court guidance, that tribal sovereign immunity from suit bars the County’s proceedings against the Nation and therefore AFFIRM the order of the district court.
Lower court materials are here.
Here are the briefs in Schaghticoke Tribal Nation v. Kent School Corp. Inc.:
Lower court materials here.
Here:
6-30-14 Petition for Rehearing En Banc
An excerpt:
The panel decision conflicts with the May 19, 2014 decision of the United States Supreme Court in Petrella v.Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 134 S.Ct. 132; 188 L.Ed.2d 979 (2014) (Petrella). Petrella held that courts may not override Congress’ judgment and apply equitable defenses to summarily dispose of claims at law filed within a statute of limitations established by Congress. The panel’s Per Curiam decision ruled that Plaintiff-Appellant Stockbridge-Munsee Community’s (Stockbridge) damages claims, which were filed within the congressionally established limitations period, are barred by the Sherrill equitable defense. Stockbridge-Munsee Cmty. v. New York; Slip Op. at 8, 2014 WL 2782191 (2d Cir. June 20, 2014) (Slip Opinion attached as Appendix). The panel’s failure to follow Petrella warrants en banc review under Fed. R. Civ. P. 35.
Panel materials here.
Here is the opinion in Stockbridge-Munsee Community v. New York:
Briefs are here.
Here are the briefs in Stockbridge-Munsee Community v. State of New York:
Stockbridge-Munsee Reply Brief
Lower court materials are here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.