Here is the opening brief:
TribeMotionCOA SubstituteBrief (3)
Sault Tribe CA6 Substitute Brief
Lower court materials here.
Here is the opening brief:
TribeMotionCOA SubstituteBrief (3)
Sault Tribe CA6 Substitute Brief
Lower court materials here.
Featuring “Steve” Matthew Fletcher. Here.
An excerpt:
Thorpe: What is likely to be the next step in this process and when might it take place?
Fletcher: The next step is to litigate the Section 9 question; that is, whether it applies at all because of MILCSA and, if so, whether it forecloses the fee to trust application. I was surprised that Judge Jonker shut down Sault Tribe this early in the process, but it really hurts the tribe. Had Sault Tribe put in their application, the federal government is a party. And especially if Interior took the land into trust, suddenly the United States is a defendant, and they’re much more difficult to defeat than a mere Indian tribe. And no one is better suited to know the implications of an injunction at this early date than Judge Jonker, with all his experience litigating against the United States in Indian gaming cases.
Thorpe: If you were a betting man, what would you say are the odds of the Lansing casino ever being built, at least be the current proposed ownership team?
Fletcher: Flip a coin. Sault Tribe, because of its advantageous position as a result of MILCSA, has the best chance of any tribe. But the Section 9 problem may shut it all down. Moreover, all it takes is one rider in an Interior appropriations bill to undercut that provision.
Here.
GRAND RAPIDS — A federal judge Wednesday said he could decide within 30 days whether to allow Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette to halt a proposed Lansing casino.
U.S. District Judge Robert Jonker announced the timeline after attorneys from the state and the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians argued in a Grand Rapids courtroom about whether Schuette’s six-count lawsuit, filed in September, should be dismissed.
Earlier coverage here.
Here are the new materials in State of Michigan v. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians (W.D. Mich.):
Michigan Reply in Support of Motion for PI
Michigan Response to SSM Motion to Dismiss
Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Potawatomi Indians filings:
2012-12-21 Amicus Brief with Exs.
2012-12-21 Memorandum in supportof Motion to file an amicus brief
2012-12-21 Motion to file an amicus brief
Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe filings:
Previous materials are here (complaint and motion for PI) and here (Sault Tribe’s responsive pleadings).
The tribe has moved to dismiss and to oppose the State’s request for a preliminary injunction.
Sault Tribe Response to Motion for PI
The complaint is here.
News coverage is here.
Here are the materials in State of Michigan v. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians (W.D. Mich.):