Here:
fishermans associations amicus brief
Supreme Court
Fort Peck Housing Authority v. HUD Cert Petition
Here:
UPDATE:
Question presented:
Whether an action for the restoration of grant in aid funds illegally recouped by the United States constitutes a suit for specific relief such that the United States’ sovereign immunity is waived pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 702, or whether it is a suit for money damages, barring relief in the federal district courts.
Washington v. United States Background Materials [culverts]
Oral argument transcript: oral argument transcript
Merits stage briefs:
Amici in Support of Petitioners:
Idaho and 10 Other States Brief
Pacific Legal Foundation Brief
Modoc Point Irrigation District Brief
Citizens Equal Rights Foundation Brief
American Forest & Paper Association and National Mining Association Brief
Washington State Association of Counties and Association of Washington Cities
Amici Supporting Respondents:
Fishermans Associations amicus brief
Warm Springs et al amicus brief
State and Local Officials amicus brief
Other docs:
Ninth Circuit panel decision here. Briefs:
Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations
En banc stage briefs:
Washington Rehearing/En Banc Petition
Idaho and Montana Amicus Brief
Klamath Critical Habitat Landowners Amicus Brief
District court materials are here:
Tribal Motion for Summary Judgment
State Motion for Summary Judgment
Cert Opposition Brief in N.M. Public Service Co. v. Barboan & Navajo
Poarch Band of Creek Indians v. Wilkes Cert Stage Materials
Tavares v. Whitehouse Cert Petition Denied
Sharp Image v. Shingle Springs Cert Petition
Here is the petition captioned Sharp Image Gaming, Inc. v. Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians:
Question presented:
Whether a collateral agreement to a management contract for an Indian gaming operation is subject to approval by the National Indian Gaming Commission only if the collateral agreement itself provides for management of all or part of the operation.
Lower court materials here.
Coverage of Upper Skagit Oral Argument
Oral Argument Transcript in Upper Skagit v. Lundgren
Harvey v. Ute Indian Tribe Cert Petition
Here:
Questions presented:
1.Whether the tribal remedies exhaustion doctrine, which requires federal courts to stay cases challenging tribal jurisdiction until the parties have exhausted parallel tribal court proceedings, applies to state courts as well.
2.Whether the tribal remedies exhaustion doctrine requires that nontribal courts yield to tribal courts when the parties have not invoked the tribal court‘s jurisdiction.
Lower court materials here.
UPDATES:
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.