Here.
We posted all the materials from this case here.
Here are the updated materials in Federal Trade Commission v. AMG (D. Nev.):
559 DCT Order Adopting MJ Report
Prior post in this part of the litigation is here. The post related to the partial settlement is here. Other posts are here and here.
From HuffPo, here.
Here:
201309_cfpb_decision-on-petition_great-plains-lending-to-set-aside-civil-investigative-demands
Thanks to S.D. More material here.
Here are the new materials in Federal Trade Commission v. Payday Financial LLC (D. S.D.):
117 DCT Order Denying PF Motion for Summary J
120 FTC Memorandum of Supplemental Authority
131 DCT Order Granting Partial Summary J to FTC
Materials from the complaint here.
Here.
An excerpt:
Online lending has become a popular venture for Indian tribes over the last several years as states have cracked down on payday loans. The tribes say that in many cases, e-commerce activities have become a vital source of revenue, especially because their remote locations inhibit their ability to operate casinos. For the Otoe Missouria Tribe, lending revenue accounts for roughly half of the tribe’s nonfederal budget, according to a court filing.
“Every Indian tribe worth its salt has to provide health care, public safety, education and a panoply of essential services to its members,” said Matthew Fletcher, a law professor at Michigan State University and an authority on Indian law. “These tribes must reach off the reservation to conduct business because there is a desperate need for revenue.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.