Here is the opening brief in Sheffer v. Buffalo Run Casino:
Here is the opinion and selected materials from Furry v. Miccosukee Tribe (S.D. Fla.):
DCT Order Dismissing Furry Complaint
Miccosukee Motion to Dismiss Furry Complaint
Furry Response to Motion to Dismiss
Miccosukee Response to Motion for Discovery on Grounds for Sovereign Immunity
Here are the materials in Rogers-Dial v. Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians (S.D. Cal.):
DCT Order Dismissing Rogers-Dial Complaint
Rogers-Dial Motion for PI — Part 1
Rogers-Dial Motion for PI — Part 2
Rogers-Dial Motion for PI — Part 3
We posted the complaint here.
Here are the materials in this stage of a long saga — Hollywood Mobile Estates v. Cypress (S.D. Fla.):
DCT Order Granting Hollywood Mobile Estates Motion
Here is the petition in MTE Financial Services v. Alameda County Superior Court:
Here is the opinion in New Gaming Systems v. Sac and Fox Nation:
Here is the opinion in Mendoza v. Tamaya Enterprises, Inc. News article here.
Along with Oklahoma, New Mexico is one of the few states to allow state law dram shop actions against tribal businesses. And, along with Oklahoma, the reasoning behind the decision is tied to the state-specific jurisdictional scheme created in the tribal gaming compacts.
Here is the order and motion to reconsider:
Jackson Band Motion for Reconsideration
And the previous order declining to dismiss (and relevant briefs) are here.
Here are the materials in Allman v. Creek Casino Wetumpka (M.D. Ala.):
Magistrate Recommendation on Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
Here are the materials in Center for Biological Diversity v. Pizarchik (D. Colo.):
You must be logged in to post a comment.