Washington SCT Rejects Immovable Property Exception to Sovereign Immunity

Here is the opinion in Flying T Ranch Inc. v. Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians:

Briefs here.

Washington COA Affirms Dismissal of Tulalip Suit against Insurance Cos. Over COVID Business Losses

Here are the available materials in Tulalip Tribes v. Lexington Insurance Co.:

Washington SCT Oral Argument in Immovable Property Case

Here is the oral argument video in Flying T Ranch v. Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians.

Briefs here.

S’posed to be immovable property.

Washington SCT Briefs in Immovable Property Immunity “Exception” Appeal

Here are the briefs in Flying T Ranch v. Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians:

Washington COA materials here.

Washington COA Affirms Tribal Immunity Applies to Tribally-Owned Fee Land

Here are the available materials in Flying T Ranch Inc. v. Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians:

Washington COA Holds Swinomish Golf Course Possesses Immunity

Here are the materials in Howson v. Similk Inc.:

State and Tribes Prevail over Big Tobacco in Washington COA Decision about Boring Taxes

Here are the materials in State of Washington v. American Tobacco Co. (Wash. Ct. App.):

Washington COA Rejects Tribal Employee Immunity Defense, But Rejects Liability on the Merits [DV Wrongful Death @ Tulalip]

Here are the available materials in Pitoitua v. Gaube (Wash. Ct. App.):

Washington COA Restores Sauk-Suiattle Nuisance Claim against City of Seattle

Here are the materials in Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe v. City of Seattle (Wash. Ct. App.):

“American Indians protesting a hydroelectric dam.”

Washington Court of Appeals on Standard of Proof at Initial Removal

827995 orderandopinion

We also conclude that when the Department has reason to believe that a child is an Indian child under ICWA and WICWA, the heightened removal standard in those statutes applies to ex parte pick-up order requests. Because the Department had reason to know A.W. is an Indian child–information not shared with the trial court–and the trial court appliced an incorrect legal standard in assessing the Department’s evidence at that stage of the proceeding, the trial court erred in not vacating the pick up order.