Kim Teehee Remarks before the United Nations

Remarks of Kimberly Teehee, Senior Policy Advisor for Native American Affairs, White House Domestic Policy Council, at the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues

Kimberly Teehee
Senior Policy Advisor for Native American Affairs

New York, NY
April 22, 2010

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Good afternoon, I am honored to be with you today. I want to begin by thanking the members of the Permanent Forum and representatives of the indigenous peoples, many of whom have travelled great distances to participate in this event. Your commitment to address the many important issues that indigenous peoples face around the world is remarkable.

At the outset of my remarks, I want to acknowledge that the United States has a unique legal and political relationship with 564 federally recognized Indian tribes, established through and confirmed by the Constitution of the United States, treaties, statutes, executive orders, and judicial decisions. President Obama is committed to strengthening and building on the government-to-government relationship between the United States and Indian tribes.

Tribal communities have contributed greatly to America’s cultural, social, and political traditions. Throughout our land, we have a diversity of indigenous cultures with rich religious traditions. Native religious practices and their expression through song and dance endure and flourish despite wayward attempts to extinguish them during less enlightened times. Tribal cultural practices add to the fabric of the United States.

From the American Revolution to military missions in Iraq and Afghanistan, Native people have served valiantly in the Armed Forces of the United States. Many brave Native men and women have made the ultimate sacrifice fighting and shedding blood for this country.

In so many ways, the First Americans have added to the wealth and betterment of the United States and the American people. Despite the contributions they have made, we have not always responded in kind. All too often, federal policies undermined the ability of Indian tribes to build strong, self-sufficient and self-governing tribal communities. When the United States adopted misguided policies, the First Americans suffered greatly.

The history of our First Americans is a history that we must acknowledge to avoid repeating our mistakes. The Native people once owned this continent and they were often dispossessed of their lands by threat of war or unbridled encroachment in the name of westward expansion. When Native people stood in the way, they were often forcefully removed. Many Americans have heard of the brutality of the Cherokee Removal called the Trail of Tears. But the Cherokees were not alone as vast communities throughout the east from New York to Florida were moved at the tip of the bayonet – their homelands forever taken.

When their tribal lands were dramatically diminished, the United States adopted a policy aimed to acculturate American Indians by breaking up their remaining tribal lands into individual allotments. There were other misguided attempts at forced assimilation – outlawing of Native religions as well as dance and song, taking of Indian children and forcing them into boarding schools which banished their language, dress, and ways of their people. The federal policy of termination was designed to end the political existence of tribal governments. In this history, there are important lessons and guidance from destructive policies that sunk tribal communities deeper into the cycle of poverty and despair.

Experience also shows us the type of policies that build the foundation for tribal communities to flourish culturally, socially and economically. Our more recent history demonstrates that tribal self-determination – the ability of tribal governments to determine how to build and sustain their own communities is necessary for successful and prospering communities. The federal policy of tribal self-determination is guided by the deep and abiding belief that tribal governments are in the best position to decide the direction of their future.

More than forty years since the United States adopted this policy of greater tribal autonomy, the record is clear—tribal self-determination has been successful. It has enabled tribal governments to establish, develop and enhance tribal institutions and infrastructure ranging from those addressing the health, education and welfare of their communities to those such as tribal courts, fire protection and law enforcement which have allowed them to better protect their communities. The clear lesson is that empowering tribes to deal with the challenges they face and taking advantage of the available opportunities will result in tribal communities that thrive.

Despite the success of this policy, the devastating consequence of the past still haunts us. Tribal communities still suffer among the most challenging socioeconomic conditions. Some reservations face unemployment rates of up to 80 percent. Nearly a quarter of all Native Americans live in poverty. Approximately 14 percent of homes on reservations don’t have electricity; and 12 percent don’t have access to a safe water supply.

Poverty often breeds crime. Native communities are faced with an increase of youth gangs engaged in drug trade. Some tribes have experienced rates of violent crime twice, four times, and at times more than 10 times the national average. Most tragically is the fact that one in three Native women will be raped in their lifetimes, which President Obama called this “an assault on our national conscience that we can no longer ignore” when he addressed tribal leaders at the White House Tribal Nations Conference last year.

Perhaps the greatest victims of poverty and violent crime on reservations are the children. Native Americans face some of the lowest matriculation rates and the highest high school and college dropout rates.

In addition, Native Americans face disproportionate health disparities compared to the general population. Native Americans die of illnesses like tuberculosis, alcoholism, diabetes, pneumonia, and influenza at far higher rates than the rest of the population.

Though our challenges are difficult, our future is far from bleak. President Obama believes that tribal leaders must be part of the solution if we are going to address the needs of Native Americans. We must begin a new era in the United States’ relationship with tribal governments, one that is built on mutual respect. By working together, on a government-to-government basis, we can realize a future where Native people live long and healthy lives in safe communities, are able to pursue economic self-sufficiency, and where their children and grandchildren can have an equal opportunity at pursuing the American dream.

To address the myriad challenges facing tribal communities, we have taken a number of steps to strengthen the government-to-government relationship between the United States and Indian tribes.

First, President Obama promised greater engagement with tribal leaders. In November, the President invited representatives from each of the 564 federally recognized Indian tribes to attend a White House Tribal Nations Conference. Nearly 400 tribal leaders attended, making it the most widely attended interactive White House tribal meeting with the President, Cabinet Secretaries, senior officials, and Members of Congress in history. The White House held listening sessions with tribal leaders and representatives from tribal organizations on health care, energy development, tribal consultation, job creation and education. The level of engagement with tribal leaders is extraordinary and continues outside of Washington, D.C. Our federal agencies are engaged in unprecedented outreach to tribal communities.

Second, President Obama believes Native Americans need representation in the Federal government to properly reflect their needs and views. History has shown that failure to include voices of tribal officials in formulating policy affecting their communities has all too often led to undesirable and, at times, devastating tragic results. To ensure that Native Americans are represented in this Administration, President Obama appointed Larry Echo Hawk of the Pawnee Nation as Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs, Dr. Yvette Roubideaux of the Rosebud Sioux tribe as the Director of the Indian Health Service, Hilary Tompkins of the Navajo Nation as the Solicitor of the Interior, Lillian Sparks of the Rosebud and Oglala Sioux Tribes as Commissioner for the Administration for Native Americans, Mary McNeil of the Winnebago Tribe as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights for the United States Department of Agriculture, and Jodi Gillette of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe as Deputy Associate Director of the White House Office of Intergovernmental Affairs. Working with tribal leaders, this team is helping shape federal policies that impact tribal communities.

Third, President Obama is committed to regular and meaningful consultation with tribal leaders. Marking a new era in the United States’ relationship with tribal governments, the President signed a Memorandum on November 5, 2009, directing every federal agency to develop a plan to fully implement Executive Order 13175, “Consultation and Coordination with Tribal Governments.” This Order mandates that all agencies have an accountable process for meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications. The federal agencies are implementing consultation plans and the level of tribal consultation is at historic levels.

Fourth, President Obama recognizes that a comprehensive response to address the needs of tribal communities means federal agencies must work together. Federal officials across various agencies are working together on a wide range of issues to improve the lives of Native Americans.

Continue reading

Building Strong Sovereign Nations: Tribal Governance Training Conference, May 19-20

Here’s a reminder of the upcoming Tribal Governance Training Conference at Little River Casino & Resort next month. See the attachment for registration and accommodation information.

May 19, 12PM-5PM
History of Anishinaabek Tribes – John Petoskey
Tribal Council Roles & Responsibilities – Frank Ettawageshik

May 20, 8AM -12PM
Indian Child Welfare Act – Kate Fort & Emily Proctor
Indian Gaming in Michigan – Bill Brooks
Introduction to Tribal Justice Systems – Holly Thompson
Labor Relations & Tribal Businesses – Zeke Fletcher

BSSN Training Conference May 19-20

Boyd Gaming Objections to Station Casinos Bankruptcy Reorganization Plan

Referenced here, via Pechanga:

Boyd Gaming Objection

Boyd Gaming Objection 2

Boyd Gaming Objection 3

Amendment to House Tribal Law and Order Act

Here: TLO House Amendment

Pages 48-51 are particularly relevant to those following the consecutive sentences cases in Arizona and New Mexico.

NYTs Article on Havasupai Settlement

From the NYTs (slideshow; related article):

SUPAI, Ariz. — Seven years ago, the Havasupai Indians, who live amid the turquoise waterfalls and red cliffs miles deep in the Grand Canyon, issued a “banishment order” to keep Arizona State University employees from setting foot on their reservation — an ancient punishment for what they regarded as a genetic-era betrayal.

Members of the tiny, isolated tribe had given DNA samples to university researchers starting in 1990, in the hope that they might provide genetic clues to the tribe’s devastating rate of diabetes. But they learned that their blood samples had been used to study many other things, including mental illness and theories of the tribe’s geographical origins that contradict their traditional stories.

The geneticist responsible for the research has said that she had obtained permission for wider-ranging genetic studies.

Acknowledging a desire to “remedy the wrong that was done,” the university’s Board of Regents on Tuesday agreed to pay $700,000 to 41 of the tribe’s members, return the blood samples and provide other forms of assistance to the impoverished Havasupai — a settlement that legal experts said was significant because it implied that the rights of research subjects can be violated when they are not fully informed about how their DNA might be used.

The case raised the question of whether scientists had taken advantage of a vulnerable population, and it created an image problem for a university eager to cast itself as a center for American Indian studies.

But genetics experts and civil rights advocates say it may also fuel a growing debate over researchers’ responsibility to communicate the range of personal information that can be gleaned from DNA at a time when it is being collected on an ever-greater scale for research and routine medical care.

“I’m not against scientific research,” said Carletta Tilousi, 39, a member of the Havasupai tribal council. “I just want it to be done right. They used our blood for all these studies, people got degrees and grants, and they never asked our permission.”

Continue reading

News Coverage on Michigan Gaming Proposals

From K’zoo Gazette, via Pechanga:

KALAMAZOO — A pair of proposals to expand gambling in Michigan would be bad for the state because they would strip away local residents’ ability to have a say in whether a casino is opened in their community, opponents say.

“We are working to preserve the right of each community to have a vote on gaming expansion,” James Nye, spokesman for Protect MI Vote, told the Kalamazoo Gazette’s Editorial Board on Tuesday.

Nye also serves as spokesman for the Gun Lake Tribe of Pottawatomi Indians, which is constructing the Gun Lake Casino in Wayland Township.

Daniel Adkins, spokesman for the pro-expansion group Racing to Save Michigan, said Nye’s arguments are undermined by the fact that Nye’s group receives money from casinos.

“The man’s goal is to make sure there is no competition. That’s the goal,” said Adkins, who is also vice president and chief operating officer of Hazel Park Harness Raceway.

A 2004 amendment to the state constitution requires that both state and local voter approval be given for any expansion of electronic gaming in Michigan. The requirement does not extend to casinos on tribal lands.

Adkins said he believes local residents would continue to have a say. Adkins’ group wants to allow casinos at five Michigan horse racing tracks, and at three other locations.

The other pro-expansion group, Michigan is Yours, proposes seven casinos in communities that have expressed interest, such as Muskegon, Lansing and Benton Harbor, said group member Trevor Sarter.

“We didn’t want it to be a situation where we are trying to push this down anyone’s throat,” Sarter said.

The groups need to collect more than 380,000 valid signatures by early July to get their measures on the November ballot.

City of Duluth Prevails in Revenue Sharing Dispute with Fond du Lac Band

Here are the materials in City of Duluth v. Fond du Lac Band (D. Minn.):

Duluth Motion for Summary Judgment

Fond du Lac Band Opposition

Kevin Washburn Affidavit

Duluth Reply

DCT Order Granting Duluth’s Motion

The complaint and answer are here.

News coverage here, via Pechanga.

American Indian Studies Graduate Student Conference @ MSU This Week

Here is the program:

Program

Thursday evening April 22, 2010

6:00 Reception and check-in, LookOUT! Gallery, Snyder-Phillips Hall

8:00 Keynote Address, “My People Will Sleep for 100 Years: Art, Activism and Visual Sovereignty,” Dr. Dylan A.T. Miner, Michigan State Residential College in Arts and Humanities, Snyder Phillips Hall Auditorium

Friday April 23, 2010

All events at Snyder Phillips Hall Auditorium unless otherwise noted

8:00 Breakfast and registration

8:30 Welcome and Introductions, Sakina Hughes, Michigan State History

8:45 Opening, Dr. Phil Bellfy, Michigan State Writing, Rhetoric & American Cultures

Session 1:  Structures of Early Colonialism

9:00 Ashley Wiersma, Michigan State History, “Re-envisioning the Origins of Orientalism and France’s Mission Civilisatrice in New France”

9:15 Deirdre McMurtry, Ohio State History, “The Post-Tridentine Trap:  Exploring the Authority of Indigenous Laity in the Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth-Century Missions, Canada and Beyond”

9:30 Richard Weyhing, Chicago, “Early America/Ethnohistory/Atlantic World; “’A Great French Chief of Many Voices:’ The Pursuit of Power and the Fragmentation of Authority in the Pays d’en Haut”

9:45 Discussion, Dr. Susan Sleeper-Smith, Michigan State History; Director, American Indian Studies Program Graduate Student Consortium

10:00 Break

Session 2:  Engaging Scholarship and Questioning Narratives

10:15 Libby R. Tronnes, Wisconsin-Madison History, “Displacing the Indigenous: The Storying of Aztalan in Nineteenth-Century Wisconsin”

10:30 Devon Miller, Michigan State Anthropology, “Telling Our Stories:  An Ethnohistorical Approach to Social Reconciliation”

10:45 Sarah Dees, Indiana Religious Studies; “Disappearing Culture?:  Tensions in Nineteenth-Century Ethnographic Salvage”

11:00 Kelley Fayard, Michigan Anthropology, “Collaborative Research in One’s Own Community”

11:15 Discussion, Dr. Mindy Morgan, Michigan State Anthropology

Continue reading

2010 Bellwood Lecture @ Idaho Law

Here is the webcast of Idaho’s Bellwood Lecture featuring Larry Echohawk, Lawrence Baca, and Rebecca Tsosie.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

Havasupai Press Release on the Arizona State DNA Settlement

Here (Havasupai ASU Press Release):

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                          CONTACT (Plaintiffs): Shayna Samuels, 718-541-4785

April 21, 2010                                              CONTACT (ABOR): Katie Paquet, 602-229-2543

Havasupai Tribe and Arizona Board of Regents Resolve Lawsuit, Announce Future Collaborations

(April 21, 2010 — Phoenix, AZ) – Yesterday the Arizona State Legislature’s Joint Legislative Budget Committee approved a settlement agreement between the Havasupai Tribe and the Arizona Board of Regents resolving litigation involving allegations of unauthorized genetic studies of Havasupai people.

Two decades ago, two former Arizona State University (ASU) researchers collected hundreds of blood samples from Havasupai members, in connection with diabetes research. According to the Havasupai, without their consent or knowledge, the samples also were used in DNA studies that conflicted with Havasupai cultural beliefs, identity and privacy.

Carletta Tilousi, lead Plaintiff and Councilwoman for the Havasupai Tribe said, “We are glad to have come to a resolution with ASU, and hope that this experience helps create better awareness, understanding and cooperation between this institution and our people, and helps us to rebuild what we have lost.”

The Arizona Board of Regents (ABOR) and Arizona State University have formally apologized to the Havasupai people, and the Tribe has acknowledged that great efforts have been made to improve the oversight and conduct of human subject and biomedical research at ASU as a result of the lawsuit.

Key elements of the settlement include return of blood samples to the Havasupai Tribe, monetary compensation to the 41 individual plaintiffs, and collaborations between ABOR and the Havasupai people in areas such as health, education, economic development, and engineering planning. For example, the Havasupai will collaborate with ASU, the largest public research university in the United States, to seek third party funding to build a new health clinic and a high school.  Havasupai Tribal Members will also be eligible for scholarships at ASU, the University of Arizona and Northern Arizona University.

Ernest Calderón, President of the Arizona Board of Regents, said that “The Board of Regents has long wanted to remedy the wrong that was done. This solution is not simply the end of a dispute but is also the beginning of a partnership between the universities, principally ASU, and the Tribe.”

The Havasupai Tribe lives at the base of the Grand Canyon in Arizona, a place reachable by an hours-long hike or mule ride, or in the modern era, a helicopter. Currently the Tribe is composed of about 650 registered members. The remoteness of their location has allowed them to retain a strong cultural identity as well as the native Havasupai language.

“This is much more than a settlement; it is a victory for the Tribe,” said Robert Rosette, Attorney for the Havasupai Tribe. “This is an opportunity to partner with the largest research institution in the United States to create programs which will help the Tribe build a stronger sovereign nation.”

“As we see it, this settlement is far more than dismissing a lawsuit; the settlement is the restoration of hope for my people, and the beginning of Nation Building for my Tribe” said Chairwoman Bernadine Jones.

#   #   #

Congrats to the Havasupai tribe and people, and to their lawyers at Rosette and Associates.