NCAI Summer 2018 Legal Internship – Domestic Violence

NCAI Summer 2018 Legal Internship – Domestic Violence

NCAI is hiring a summer intern to assist us in our work concerning domestic violence in Indian Country.  Students must have completed at least one year of law school by the start of the internship. Intern applicants must be able to serve a minimum of 16 hours per week, for a minimum of six weeks. The internship is based in our Washington, DC office.  Internships are unpaid, but many schools will offer college credit or financial assistance, and some tribes may be willing to sponsor NCAI interns from their tribe. NCAI will be glad to provide information to your school or tribe to assist in securing credit or financial support for your internship.

The intern will work directly with a team of NCAI staff to plan and coordinate NCAI’s outreach and advocacy work concerning Domestic Violence, specifically NCAI’s projects on VAWA 2013 expanded criminal jurisdiction and on mapping domestic violence resources throughout Indian Country. Responsibilities include legal research, drafting legal memos, helping organize the summer 2018 meeting of the Inter-Tribal Working Group, helping assess gaps in domestic violence services, and organizing webinars on legal topics.

Applications will be accepted on a rolling basis until a candidate is selected. Applicants are encouraged to apply as soon as possible.

Interested applicants should apply by emailing ereese@ncai.org a resume, law school grade sheet, writing sample, and cover letter that includes a brief explanation of your interest in the position, tribal affiliation (if any), and two references.

NYTs on Team Indigenous [Roller Derby]

Here is “‘Decolonizing’ Roller Derby? Team Indigenous Takes Up the Challenge.”

NPR Article on Sherman Alexie

Here is “‘It Just Felt Very Wrong’: Sherman Alexie’s Accusers Go On The Record.”

Sarah Krakoff on Bears Ears

Sarah Krakoff has posted “Public Lands, Conservation, and the Possibility of Justice” on SSRN. The paper is forthcoming in the Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review.

Here is the abstract:

On December 28, 2016, President Obama issued a proclamation designating the Bears Ears National Monument pursuant to his authority under the Antiquities Act of 1906, which allows the President to create monuments on federal public lands. Bears Ears, which is located in the heart of Utah’s dramatic red rock country, contains a surfeit of ancient Puebloan cliff-dwellings, petroglyphs, pictographs, and archeological artifacts. The area is also famous for its paleontological finds and its desert biodiversity. Like other national monuments, Bears Ears therefore readily meets the statutory objective of preserving “historic and prehistoric structures, and other objects of historic or scientific interest.” Unlike every other monument since the passage of the Antiquities Act, however, Bears Ears was proposed by a coalition of American Indian Tribes. The Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition, which submitted the proposal to protect Bears Ears, included representatives from the Hopi Tribe, Navajo Nation, Ute Mountain Ute, Uintah and Ouray Ute, and Zuni tribal governments.

Historically, the Antiquities Act and other federal conservation laws played very different roles in the lives of Native people. Conservation laws divested Tribes of their lands and cultural heritage in the name of preserving these resources for others. Moreover, federal laws and policies designed to destroy tribal political structures were at their apex during the same period that early conservation policy was formed. Together, and complemented by laws that privatized vast swathes of the federal public domain, conservation law and federal Indian law effected a joint project of Indian elimination. This Article explores that dark side of conservation history, and describes the very different process that led to the Bears Ears designation. It argues that by restoring tribal connections to the landscape, Bears Ears National Monument serves as a partial act of reparations.

Today, Bears Ears National Monument is under threat. President Trump reduced the Monument to a small fraction of its size and divided it into two parcels. The Tribes, along with conservation groups, have sued, arguing that the Antiquities Act authorizes the President only to create monuments, not to eliminate or shrink them unilaterally. As that legal battle plays out, the story of Bears Ears remains worth telling. Its saga explores the intertwined histories of the development of racial attitudes and environmental thought, and fills in an important chapter in the larger story of Indian appropriation. The inter-tribal effort to establish Bears Ears will leave its mark on public lands and conservation law, regardless of the ebbs and flows of current legal disputes.

NCAI Amicus Brief in South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc.

Here:

NCAI Amicus Brief in South Dakota v. Wayfair

United States Tax Court Holds Income Earned from Seneca Lands is Taxable

Here is the opinion in Perkins v. Commissioner:

Opinion

Details on the MSU-Hosted Event Today (in case anyone’s asking)

THE FOUNDATION FOR THE MARKETPLACE OF IDEAS BRINGS NATIONAL SOCIALISM TO MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY

WHAT IS THE FOUNDATION FOR THE MARKETPLACE OF IDEAS?

Maine Court Denies Maliseet Indian Motion to Dismiss Fishing Prosecution

Here is the order in State v. Bear:

WALcr-16-636

Update in Cayuga Nation Leadership Dispute

Here are the materials in Cayuga Nation v. Zinke (D.D.C.):

16 Interior Motion to Dismiss

17 Cayuga Nation Council Motion to Intervene

19 Plaintiffs Opposition to 16

20 Plaintiffs Opposition to 17

22 Plaintiffs Motion for PI

24 Cayuga Nation Council Reply in Support of 17

29 DCT Order Granting Motion to Intervene

31 Cayuga Nation Council Opposition to 22

32 Interior Opposition to 22

33 Interior Reply in Support of 16

37 Plaintiffs Reply in Support of 22

Related post.