New Mexico Federal Court Convicts Man Accused of Indian Arts and Crafts Act Violations

Here are the materials in United States v. Haack (D.N.M.):

26 Indictment

222 Motion for Acquittal

222-1 Exhibit A

223 Opposition

233 DCT Order

try not to look at the fingers

DOJ press release here.

South Dakota Federal Court Suppresses Non-Mirandized Answer to Tribal Membership Question

Here are the materials in United States v. Whipple-Wright (D.S.D.):

Not One More: The Not Invisible Act Commission Final Report Removed from DOJ Wesbite

But we have it here.

And for good measure, we have to DOJ/DOI joint response (which is still available on the DOJ website):

Eighth Circuit Holds Mille Lacs Ojibwe Dispute with County Sheriff Was Mooted by State Legislation, but Vacates Lower Court Opinion Holding Reservation Was Not Disestablished

Here is the opinion in Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe v. Madore.

Briefs.

Creek Nation Sues Prosecutors, Too

Here is the complaint in Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Ballard (N.D. Okla.):

Here is the complaint in Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Iski (N.D. Okla.):

Montana SCT Briefs in County Effort to Force Reimbursement for PL280 Costs

Here are the briefs in Lake County v. State of Montana:

Tenth Circuit Affirms Restitution Award in Indian Country Manslaughter Case

Here is the opinion in United States v. Johnson.

Petition for Rehearing in City of Tulsa v. O’Brien

Here:

Prior post here.

DOJ Suits Against Oklahoma Prosecutors

Here are the pleadings in United States v. Iski (N.D. Okla.):

And here are the pleadings in United States v. Ballard (N.D. Okla.):

Kirsten Carlson on Justice in Alaska

Kirsten Matoy Carlson has published “Justice Beyond the State” in the Alaska Law Review. PDF

Abstract:

For decades the intersectionality of extreme rurality and cultural difference has led scholars and tribal leaders to advocate for recognition of local authority as a solution to the justice gap in rural Alaska. Local control often means developing courts in and extending jurisdiction to Alaska Native villages. This Article evaluates strengthening tribal courts or justice systems through restorations of jurisdiction as a way to address access to justice issues in Alaska Native villages. It argues that restorations of jurisdiction and the development of tribal justice systems must ensure that Alaska Natives define the justice provided in their communities. Restorations of jurisdiction that require Alaska Native villages to replace their traditions and laws with adversarial processes and values threaten to undermine access to justice.