EPA Issues Water Quality Regulation to Protect the Penobscot River

Link: Bangor Daily News article by Judy Harrison,

Download: Promulgation of Certain Federal Water Quality Standards Applicable to Maine (Final Rule)Fact Sheet: Final Rule on Certain Federal Water Quality Standards Applicable to MaineResponse to Public Comments

EPA Issues Water Quality Regulation to Protect the Penobscot River

On Thursday, the EPA issued water quality standards governing the Penobscot River to protect the sustenance fishing rights of the Penobscot Nation.  Penobscot Chief, Kirk Francis, praised EPA.  “This is great news for the Penobscot River, the Penobscot People, and the State of Maine,” said Francis.  “This brings us one step closer to restoring the fish habitat of the Penobscot River for the betterment of all who use this extraordinary River.”

The Penobscot River, the aboriginal homeland of the Penobscot Indian Nation, historically supported the largest habitat for sea run salmon in the North Atlantic.  The Penobscot River has also supported robust populations of shad, eel, alewives, blueback herring and multiple other species that the Penobscots have relied upon for food.

The Atlantic salmon is an anadromous fish, which typically spends 2-3 years in freshwater before migrating to the ocean, where it also spends 2-3 years before returning to its natal river to spawn.  Although the Atlantic salmon has been listed on the endangered species list since 2009, the State of Maine, a number of US agencies, NGOs, and the Penobscot Nation are working together in an internationally-recognized river restoration project to improve fish habitats in the Penobscot River through dam removals and other efforts.

“The federal and private investment of millions of dollars to restore the Penobscot River’s migratory fisheries is now resulting in rebounding runs of herring, shad, sturgeon, and over time we expect, Atlantic salmon.” said Andrew Goode, Vice President of the Atlantic Salmon Federation.  “The EPA’s water quality standards are an important contribution to the restoration of these fisheries for the benefit of the Penobscot Indian Nation and the people of Maine.”

A year ago, the EPA disapproved human health criteria that Maine used in its water quality standards because they exposed Penobscot tribal members and other Maine Indians to cancer risks, given tribal fish consumption rates.  Maine used a fish consumption rate of 32.4 grams per day for Native populations.  The EPA found that rate erroneous and adopted water quality standards to protect the health of tribal members at a consumption rate of 286 grams per day.

Historically, Penobscot tribal members have consumed fish and other food sources from the Penobscot River at much higher rates.  In the 1980s and early 1990s, for example, Penobscots relied upon the River for food sources at the rates averaging up to 750 grams per day. But those consumption rates went down in the face of dioxin and other pollutant contamination in the River.

“We still have a ways to go to restore the health of the River,” said Chief Francis, “but EPA’s water quality standards are a huge step forward to ensure that Penobscot people can safely eat from the River as we have done for centuries.”

In 1980, upon settling land claims of the Penobscot Nation and other tribes, the US Congress confirmed that the tribes would have a right to take fish within their reservations for sustenance.  Last year, the EPA, backed by the US Department of the Interior, told Maine that the law required the existence of fish of a quality to eat at meaningful levels of consumption.  Maine officials have, in the past, taken the position that the Tribes’ sustenance fishing rights do not guarantee a fish habitat.

Public support for EPA’s water quality standards is overwhelming:  of the 107 comments provided to the Agency, 101 were in favor of the standards and only 6 voiced concerns. EPA’s standards protect the fishing rights of all Maine tribes.

“As indigenous people, we have long known that water is life,” said Chief Francis.  “EPA’s water quality standards protect life; it’s as simple as that.”

#NoDAPL Turned on its Head

Here’s a piece by Terry Anderson & Shawn Regan arguing that the reasons that Standing Rock opposes the pipeline have to with the fact that the Tribe couldn’t benefit economically from DAPL due to stifling federal regulation. This is a very troubling argument that I worry is just 50s-era termination in sheep’s clothing.

Ninth Circuit Rules against Karuk in Forest Cutting Case

Here is the unpublished opinion in Karuk Tribe v. Stelle.

Briefs are here.

Navajos Seek $160M for Damages in Gold King Mine Spill

“Navajo Nation Attorney General Ethel Branch said in the release that the spill transformed the river from a “life-giver and protector” to a “threat” to the Navajo people, crops and animals.”

Story is HERE.

WaPo: “In Dakota Access pipeline controversy, Obama’s ties to tribes played pivotal role”

Here.

Oglala Sioux Tribe Preliminary Response to DAPL Easement

Download(PDF): Re: Easement for Dakota Access PipelineRe: Request for Emergency Assistance

Links: SD Executive Order 2016-08

Sioux Tribes Request Precautionary Measures to Protect Against DAPL

Download(PDF):

Filed on behalf of Standing Rock, Cheyenne River, and Yankton Sioux Tribes by the American Indian Law Clinic at Colorado Law, Earthjustice, and Fredericks, Peebles and Morgan LLP.

Measures requested:

  1. Deny the easement allowing construction of the pipeline under the Missouri River at
    Lake Oahe as soon as possible;
  2. Complete a full environmental impact statement in formal consultation with the Tribes;
  3. Establish clear rules requiring that indigenous peoples who may be affected by
    government decisions have the opportunity for full and meaningful prior informed
    consent within the meanings established in the UN Declaration on the Rights of
    Indigenous Peoples and the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court and this
    Commission;
  4. Establish clear rules ensuring full environmental and social assessment of activities that may affect indigenous peoples, with the full participation of the affected indigenous peoples;
  5. Immediately take all actions necessary to guarantee the safety of those engaging in
    peaceful prayer and protest concerning DAPL, and to ensure the full enjoyment of their rights to expression and assembly;
  6. Any other action this Commission deems appropriate.

Financial Blog: “Trump advisors aim to privatize oil-rich Indian reservations”

Here.

Memorandum from Department of Army and Notice of Document from Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. Army Corps of Engineers

From the D.C. District Court:

Notice of Document

Department of Army Memorandum Denying Easement

Army Corps Denies Easement at Standing Rock Pipeline Crossing

NYTs

Press release from NCAI here