Contributors
Tag Archives: Dakota Access Pipeline
Danielle Delaney on Environmental Law, Indigenous Identity, and #NoDAPL
Danielle Delaney has published “Under Coyote’s Mask: Environmental Law, Indigenous Identity, and #NoDAPL” in the Michigan Journal of Race & Law. The abstract: This Article studies the relationship between the three main lawsuits filed by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, … Continue reading
Tribal Motions for Summary Judgment in Standing Rock v. Army Corps [Dakota Access Pipeline]
Here are the new materials in Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.): 418 DCT Order on Administrative Record 433-2 Standing Rock Motion for Summary Judgment 434-2 Oglala Motion for Summary Judgment 435-1 Yankton Motion … Continue reading
Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, cultural resources, Environmental, Research, treaty rights
Tagged Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe, D.C. District Court., Dakota Access Pipeline, Indian country pipelines, NoDAPL, Oglala Sioux Tribe, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Yankton Sioux Tribe
“Life in the Native American oil protest camps”
From BBC, here.
Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, Environmental, News
Tagged Dakota Access Pipeline
Federal Court Orders Partial Supplementation to Dakota Access Pipeline Administrative Record
Here is the order in Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.): SRST v USACOE
Reviews of Nick Estes’ “Our History Is the Future: Standing Rock Versus the Dakota Access Pipeline, and the Long Tradition of Indigenous Resistance”
NPR The Intercept HNN The book webpage from Verso is here.
Federal Court Dismisses Dakota Access Pipeline-Related RICO Suit Brought by Pipeline Co. against Greenpeace and Individual Indians
Here are the materials in Energy Transfer Equity LP v. Greenpeace International (D.N.D.): 95 Amended Complaint 102 Greenpeace Fund MTD 103-1 Greenpeace Intl MTD 111 Response 121 Two Bulls MTD 125 Response 126 Two Bulls Reply 130 Montoya MTD 131 … Continue reading
Iowa Law Review Student Scholarship on How NHPA Fails Tribal Interests
Amanda M. Marincic has published “The National Historic Preservation Act: An Inadequate Attempt to Protect the Cultural and Religious Sites of Native Nations” in the Iowa Law Review. An excerpt: Beginning in 2016, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe engaged in … Continue reading
Federal Court Rejects Yankton Sioux Arguments on Dakota Access Pipeline
Here are the materials in the consolidated cases known as Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.): 292 Yankton Sioux Tribe Motion for Summary J 317-1 Army Corps Response 319 Dakota Access Response 324 Reply … Continue reading
New Scholarship on DAPL and Tribal Jurisdiction
Andrew Rome has published “Black Snake on the Periphery: The Dakota Access Pipeline and Tribal Jurisdictional Sovereignty” in the North Dakota Law Review.
Court Finds Tribes’ Interim Conditions Reasonable and Appropriate
Here is the opinion in the matter of Standing Rock Sioux Tribe et al v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers et al (D.D.C. 16-cv-01534): Doc. 304 – Memorandum Opinion Link: Previous posts, other documents related to Dakota Access Pipeline
Posted in Author: Sarah Donnelly, Environmental, Research
Tagged D.C. Circuit, Dakota Access Pipeline, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.)
