Minnesota Federal Court Dismisses Suit Against Tribal Gaming Executives

Here are the materials in North Metro Harness Initiative LLC v. Beattie (D. Minn.):

1 Complaint

29 Prairie Island Motion to Dismiss

39 Mille Lacs Motion to Dismiss

50 State Amicus Brief

62 Plaintiffs Opposition

68 Tribes Reply

85 DCT Order

89 Motion for Rule 59(e) Relief

93 Tribes Opposition

100 DCT Order 59(e) Motion

UNLV Gaming Law Journal Special Section on Indian Law

Here:

PDF

Editor’s Note
Valerie Andalibi-Alvarenga

PDF

Introduction
Danielle Finn

PDF

Beyond Bingo: How Class II Bingo-Based “Slot Machines” Are Reshaping Tribal-State Dynamics
Kelsey Henderson

PDF

Economic Development for Native Nevada: How Indian Gaming Can Further Tribal Self-Determination
Makai Zuniga

PDF

Keynote Speech from the 2025 Indian Nations Gaming & Governance Program Symposium
Patrice Kunesh

Sixth Circuit Amicus Brief from Tribal and Private Gaming Operators in Michigan re: Pari-Mutual Blah Blah Blah

Here is the brief in Churchill Downs Technology Initiatives Co. v. Michigan Gaming Control Board:

Tribal Amicus Brief in Third Circuit Appeal re: Company Using Event Contracts (Derivatives) to Engage in Sports Gambling

Here is the brief in Kalshiex LLC v. Flaherty:

Lower court opinion:

Two California Tribes Sue Non-Indian Gaming Companies

Here is the complaint in Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians v. Parkwest Bicycle Casino LLC (Cal. Super.):

Illinois SCT Dismisses Forest County Potawatomi Challenge to State Gaming Licensure Procedures as Moot Caused Challenged Licenses Have Already Been Issued, “Too Bad, So Sad” Theory Prevails

Here is the opinion in Waukegan Potawatomi Casino LLC v. Illinois Gaming Board:

Bill Wood

Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria Sue Interior over Trust Land Acquisition for Koi Nation of Northern California

Here is the complaint in Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria v. Haaland (N.D. Cal.):

Cherokee Nation Sues Arkansas over Choctaw-Supported Gaming Referendum

Here is the amended complaint in Cherokee Nation Businesses LLC v. State of Arkansas (E.D. Ark.):

Chukchansi Sues California over Class III Gaming Compact Negotiations

Here is the complaint in Picayune Rancheria of the Chukchansi Indians v. Newsom (C.D. Cal.):

Illinois Federal Court Orders Arbitration in Case about Monopolization of Card Shuffling Technology blah blah blah

Here are the materials in Tonkawa Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v. Scientific Games Corporation (N.D. Ill.):

39 Second Amended Complaint

49 Motion to Compel Arbitration

54 Response

61 Reply