Here are those materials:
BMG Petition for En Banc Rehearing
Chukchansi Response to Petition for Rehearing En Banc
Here are the earlier materials, and a link to an Indian Country Today piece on the case.
Here are those materials:
BMG Petition for En Banc Rehearing
Chukchansi Response to Petition for Rehearing En Banc
Here are the earlier materials, and a link to an Indian Country Today piece on the case.
Here the materials so far in this pending case:
Here are the materials in (M.D. Fla.):
The district court dismissed the complaint (here) challenging the removal of certain council members from their positions (DCT Order Dismissing Ventura Complaint), and a related habeas petition (petition: Ventura Habeas Petition; dismissal order: DCT Order Dismissing Ventura Habeas Petition).
Here is the order granting certiorari in Seneca Telephone Co. v. Miami Tribe of Oklahoma: Oklahoma SCT Order
The Miami Tribe was the petitioner.
Here are most of the lower court briefs.
And the lower court opinion.
According to Indianz, the Mohegan Tribe settled this matter (VanStaen-Holland v. Lavigne), which was to be argued before the Connecticut Supreme Court today.
Some of the briefs are available, and worth reading:
As noted at Indianz, this case is quickly moving, and here are the materials so far:
Here is the opinion in Maynes v. Unkechauge Tribal Council (E.D. N.Y.):
Maynes v. Unkechauge Tribal Council
An excerpt:
Therefore, given that the Unkechaug Nation is an Indian Nation under federal common law, it enjoys sovereign immunity. Accordingly, the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate the plaintiffs’ claims and the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as against the Unkechaug Nation.
You must be logged in to post a comment.