Here is Seneca County’s opening brief:
Lower court materials are here.
Here are the materials in Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida Dept. of Revenue (S.D. Fla.):
DCT Order Granting Florida Motion
Florida Dept. of Revenue Motion to Dismiss
Florida Dept. of Revenue Reply
An excerpt:
The Court will dismiss the Complaint for two reasons. First, the Rooker-Feldman doctrine deprives this Court of subject-matter jurisdiction over any claims that essentially seek review of the previous state-court action. Second, because the fuel tax applies only to off-reservation activity, Plaintiff’s claims are barred by the Tax Injunction Act.
The Florida courts previously ruled in a similar claim a few years back; hence, the Rooker-Feldman doctrine.
Here.
TOC:
Here:
Yakama v Haight Tribal Court Complaint (USDC)
Yakama v Haight Tribal Court TRO (USDC)
Yakama v Haight Tribal Court TRO Motion (USDC)
Related federal court materials are here.
Here are the materials in State of Washington v. Yakama Nation Tribal Court (E.D. Wash.):
News coverage here.
Here:
An excerpt:
Notice 2012-60, 2012-41 I.R.B. 455, provides guidance on federal tax treatment of certain per capita payments made to members of Indian tribes. Since publication of Notice 2012-60, six additional tribes – Qawalangin Tribe of Unalaska, Tlingit & Haida Tribes of Alaska, Northwestern Band of Shoshone Indians, Hoopa Valley Tribe, the Ak-Chin Indian Community, and the Oglala Sioux Tribe – have reached tribal trust case settlements with the United States and have been included in the Appendix.
Prior notice here.
Here:
Lower court materials here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.