Montana SCT Affirms Constitutionality of CSKT Water Rights Compact

Here is the opinion in Flathead Joint Board of Control v. State.

Briefs:

Board brief

State brief

Tribe brief

Board reply

State reply

Cert Stage Briefs in Coachella Valley Water District v. Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians

Here:

Coachella Cert Petition

States Amicus Brief

Agua Caliente Cert Opp

US Cert Opp

Coachella Reply

Desert Water Agency Reply

Agua Caliente Supplemental Brief

Cert Opposition Briefs in Coachella v. Agua Caliente

Here:

Agua Caliente Cert Opp

US Cert Opp

Cert petition here.

Federal Court Concludes Spain Extinguished Jemez, Santa Ana, and Zia Pueblo Water Rights

Here are the available materials in United States v. Abousleman (D.N.M.):

4383 Magistrate Report

4384 Jemez and Santa Ana Pueblos Objections

4385 US Objections

4386 Zia Pueblo Objections

4388 Coalition Response

4389 State Reponse

4390 US Reply

4392 Pueblo Reply

4397 DCT Order Adopting Magistrate Report

Montana SCT Holds Water Rights Associated with Former Crow Allotment but Now Held by Others are Not Part of Tribal Water Right

Here are the materials in In re Scott Ranch:

Opinion/Order 

Amicus Curiae Brief 

Appellant Brief 

Pyramid Lake Paiute Wins More Water in Ninth Circuit

Here is the unpublished memorandum in Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. Board of Directors of the Truckee-Carson Irrigation District.

Briefs:

Pyramid Lake Opening Brief

Response Brief

Reply Brief

Oral argument video is here.

New Scholarship on Indigenous Water Justice

Jason A. Robison, Barbara A. Cosens, Sue Jackson, Kelsey Leonard, and Daniel McCool have posted “Indigenous Water Justice” on SSRN.

Here is the abstract:

Indigenous Peoples are struggling for water justice across the globe. These struggles stem from centuries-long, ongoing colonial legacies and hold profound significance for Indigenous Peoples’ socioeconomic development, cultural identity, and political autonomy and external relations within nation-states. Ultimately, Indigenous Peoples’ right to self-determination is implicated. Growing out of a symposium hosted by the University of Colorado Law School and the Native American Rights Fund in June 2016, this Article expounds the concept of “indigenous water justice” and advocates for its realization in three major transboundary river basins: the Colorado (U.S./Mexico), Columbia (Canada/U.S.), and Murray-Darling (Australia). The Article begins with a novel conceptualization of indigenous water justice rooted in the historic United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP)—specifically, UNDRIP’s foundational principle of self-determination. In turn, the Article offers overviews of the basins and narrative accounts of enduring water-justice struggles experienced by Indigenous Peoples therein. Finally, the Article synthesizes commonalities evident from the indigenous water justice struggles by introducing and deconstructing the concept of “water colonialism.” Against this backdrop, the Article revisits UNDRIP to articulate principles and prescriptions aimed at prospectively realizing indigenous water justice in the basins and around the world.

Aamodt Case Finally Concludes

Here is “Santa Fe County water rights suit reaches milestone after 51 years.”

Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Crow Allottees Challenge to Water Compact

Here is the order in Crow Allottees Assn. v. Bureau of Indian Affairs:

Crow Allottees Memorandum Opinion

Briefs:

Opening Brief

Federal Answer Brief

Reply

Lower court materials here.

Water District Files Cert Petition in Agua Caliente Water Rights Matter

Here is the petition in Coachella Valley Water District v. Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians:

Coachella Cert Petition

Question presented:

Whether, when, and to what extent the federal reserved right doctrine recognized in Winters v. United States, 207 U.S. 564 (1908), preempts state-law regulation of groundwater.

Lower court materials here.

UPDATE (8/14/17):

17-40 -42 Agua Caliente Amicus Brief