Here.
Grist: “A record 6 Native Americans were elected to Congress. Here’s where they stand on climate.”
Here.
Here.
Here is the opinion. From the syllabus:
Plaintiff/Appellant Comanche Nation of Oklahoma, a federally recognized Indian Tribe, ex rel. Comanche Nation Tourism Center, filed a lawsuit seeking a declaratory judgment that Defendant/Appellant Wallace Coffey was indebted to it for the amount of the outstanding balance on an open account. The trial court granted Coffey’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and dismissed the case with prejudice. Thereafter, Coffey filed an application for prevailing party attorney fees pursuant to 12 O.S.2011 § 936. The trial court denied Coffey’s request for attorney fees, finding he was not the prevailing party because he had not prevailed on the merits of the action. Coffey appealed the order denying attorney fees, and this Court retained the appeal. We hold a defendant is not a “prevailing party” within the meaning of 12 O.S. § 936 when the court dismisses the action with prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The trial court’s order denying Coffey’s motion for attorney fees is affirmed.
Here are pdfs of the separate opinions:
And the lone pleading I could locate:
Here.
Here.
Here.
Here.
Here are the materials in Jensen v. EXC Inc. (D. Ariz.):
220 Jensen Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law
And here are the Ninth Circuit briefs (so far):
Prior posts on this case are here.
Here is the opinion in United States v. Clark.
“Thirty years after Congress passed the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, only a fraction of human remains held by Texas’ museums and universities have been returned.”
Here.
Here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.