Here.
Briefs here.
Here is the opinion in Gordon v. Lynch.
An excerpt:
Since Gordon faces only a remote risk of federal prosecution or civil penalties, and any further merits decision would not shield him from the effects of possible state or local lawsuits, the case is moot. We affirm the district court’s vacatur of the preliminary injunction for lack of jurisdiction, and we therefore do not reach the district court’s further conclusion that the case is prudentially moot.
Here is the opinion in Keepseagle v. Vilsack.
An excerpt:
Appellant Timothy LaBatte, a class member in a class action against the United States Department of Agriculture (“USDA”), seeks to intervene in that class action – despite the fact that the action was settled and closed – after his claim for compensation under the terms of the action’s settlement agreement was denied. We affirm the District Court’s determination that it lacked ancillary jurisdiction to hear Labatte’s challenge. We do so because LaBatte’s motion to intervene is unrelated to the underlying lawsuit and because the District Court was not required to hear LaBatte’s motion in order to effectuate its decrees.
Here are the briefs in State of Alaska v. Akiachak Native Community:
2015-08-24 AK appeal brief vs Akiachak
Response briefs filed in State of Alaska v. Akiachak Native Community;
Tribal Appellees Response Brief
Previous coverage here.
Here:
2015 07 06 Statement of Issues
2015 07 06 Underlying Decision in Case–Memorandum Opinion
2015 12 03 Fond du Lac Band Amicus for Appellee Brief
Lower court briefs:
25 Duluth Motion for Summary J
26 US Cross Motion for Summary J
27-1 Fond du Lac Proposed Amicus Brief
DCT order Denying NIGC Motion to Dismiss
Complaint here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.