Enbridge Claims It Cannot Meet July 2026 Deadline to Shut Down Line 5 on Bad River Rez and Demands More Time

Here are new materials in Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Enbridge Energy Company (W.D. Wis.):

Previous post.

Michigan Federal Court Bars State of Michigan from Enforcing Cancellation of Line 5 Pipeline Easement Against Enbridge

Here are materials in Enbridge Energy LLP v. Whitmer (W.D. Mich.):

125 Enbridge Brief

129-1 Canada Amicus Brief

134 Michigan Response

140 Federal Brief

145 States Amicus Brief

146 Tribal Amicus Brief

148 Enbridge Reply

151 Enbridge Supplemental Brief

152 Michigan Supplemental Brief

158 Amended Complaint

164 DCT Order

Tribal Nations Amicus Brief in Enbridge v. Nessel

Here:

Earthjustice article detailing the issue and the brief here.

New Student Scholarship on Anishinaabe Treaty Rights and Bad River’s Suit against Enbridge Line 5

Delaney Kelly has published ““We Stand With the Water”: Ojibwe Treaty Rights, the Walleye Wars, and the Imminent Threat of Enbridge’s Line 5” in the Drake Journal of Agricultural Law.

Here is the abstract:

Enbridge Energy’s crude oil pipeline, known as Line 5, currently poses a serious threat to the vitality of the Bad River in Wisconsin and the Great Lakes more broadly. Its construction threatens centuries old treaty rights of Ojibwe nations. Line 5 has been the subject of protest and extensive legal action over the past decade. This Note analyzes the legal claims leveraged by various Ojibwe nations against Enbridge. First, it considers the history of the Ojibwe people in the Midwest region and the treaties forged between the United States and Ojibwe leaders, which enshrined rights to hunt, fish, and gather on both reservation and ceded territory. Then, it analyzes the attempted forced removal of the Ojibwe by the federal government, despite these treaties. Next, it details early twentieth century criminalization of the exercise of the right to hunt, fish, and gather, and the legal battle to exercise those reserved rights. Then, it discusses the Walleye Wars of the late twentieth century. Finally, this Note describes how the contemporary legal battle against Enbridge’s Line 5 builds upon this legacy, arguing that the environmental threat posed by the pipeline inhibits the ability to exercise reserved treaty rights, and threatens the vitality of the land.

Michigan Tribes Exit U.S. Army Corps Sham “Consultation” re: Line 5

Here:

Bad River Ojibwe Petitions for Review of Wisconsin’s Approval of Re-Route of Line 5

Here is the petition in Bad River Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources (Wis. Cir. Ct.):

Sixth Circuit Remands Michigan’s Suit against Enbridge to State Court [this is a good thing]

Here is the opinion in Nessel v. Enbridge Energy LP.

Briefs here.

The Halluci-Nation concurs.

Seventh Circuit Briefs in Bad River v. Enbridge

Here:

Lower court materials here, here, and here.

Sixth Circuit Briefs in Nessel v. Enbridge Energy LP

Here:

63 Tribal and First Nations Support Attorney General Dana Nessel in 6th Circuit Court of Appeals – Line 5

Amicus Briefs (also known as “friend of the court” briefs) in support of Nessel’s position were filed by 12 states and the District of Columbia63 Tribal and First Nationsthe Great Lakes Business Network (a network of over 200 businesses that rely on the Great Lakes including Bell’s Brewery, Patagonia, and Cherry Republic), and an environmental group committed to protecting the Great Lakes known as For Love Of Water.