Here is the complaint in Lac Courte Oreilles Financial Services LLC v. Cane Bay Partners VI LLLP (W.D. Wis.):
Lac Courte Oreilles Ojibwe Company Sues for Greater Control over its Lending Business
Western District of Wisconsin
Wisconsin Federal Court Enjoins Red Cliff Ojibwe Tribal Court Proceeding against Opioid Company
Here are the materials in McKinsey & Company v. Boyd (W.D. Wis.):
Wisconsin Federal Court Dismisses Employment Suit against Great Lakes Inter-Tribal
Here are the materials in Seneca v. Great Lakes Inter-Tribal Council Inc. (W.D. Wis.):
Wisconsin Federal Court Dismisses False Claims Act Suit brought by Former LCO Employee
Here are the materials in Mestek v. Lac Courte Oreilles Community Health Center (W.D. Wis.):
Wisconsin Federal Court Rejects Enbridge Demand to Depose Bad River Council Members “Thought Processes”
Here are materials in Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Enbridge Inc. (W.D. Wis.):
Prior post here.
Wisconsin Tribes Sue to Stop State’s Idiotic Wolf Hunt
Here are the materials in Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin v. Cole (W.D. Wis.):
Wisconsin Federal Court Holds Tax Immunities Do Not Apply to Reacquired Reservation Land
Here are the relevant materials in Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Evers (W.D. Wis.):
153 State Motion for Summary J
171 Towns and Assessors Motion for Summary J
172 Tribe Motion for Summary J
223 State Reply in Support of 153
228 Towns and Assessors Reply in Support of 171
232 Tribe Reply in Support of 172
Prior post here.
Agreement Documents in Lac Courte Oreilles v. Wisconsin Treaty Rights Matter
Red Cliff Ojibwe Prevails over Bayfield County in Zoning Dispute
Here are the materials in Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Bayfield County (W.D. Wis.):
Excerpt:
Plaintiff Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians seeks a declaratory judgment that enforcement of defendant Bayfield County’s zoning code on fee simple land held by tribal members within the Red Cliff Band Reservation violates federal Indian law. Before the court is plaintiff’s fully briefed motion for summary judgment (dkt. #10), on which the court heard oral argument on November 21, 2019. For the reasons that follow, the court will grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, finding that it is not unmistakably clear that Congress intended to allow application of the County’s zoning regulations on land held by tribal members within the boundary of the reservation.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.