Here is the complaint in Lac Courte Oreilles Financial Services LLC v. Cane Bay Partners VI LLLP (W.D. Wis.):

Here is the complaint in Lac Courte Oreilles Financial Services LLC v. Cane Bay Partners VI LLLP (W.D. Wis.):
Here are the materials in McKinsey & Company v. Boyd (W.D. Wis.):
Here are the materials in Seneca v. Great Lakes Inter-Tribal Council Inc. (W.D. Wis.):
Here are the materials in Mestek v. Lac Courte Oreilles Community Health Center (W.D. Wis.):
Here are materials in Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa Indians v. Enbridge Inc. (W.D. Wis.):
Prior post here.
Here are the materials in Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin v. Cole (W.D. Wis.):
Here are the relevant materials in Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Evers (W.D. Wis.):
153 State Motion for Summary J
171 Towns and Assessors Motion for Summary J
172 Tribe Motion for Summary J
223 State Reply in Support of 153
228 Towns and Assessors Reply in Support of 171
232 Tribe Reply in Support of 172
Prior post here.
Here are the materials in Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. Bayfield County (W.D. Wis.):
Excerpt:
Plaintiff Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians seeks a declaratory judgment that enforcement of defendant Bayfield County’s zoning code on fee simple land held by tribal members within the Red Cliff Band Reservation violates federal Indian law. Before the court is plaintiff’s fully briefed motion for summary judgment (dkt. #10), on which the court heard oral argument on November 21, 2019. For the reasons that follow, the court will grant plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, finding that it is not unmistakably clear that Congress intended to allow application of the County’s zoning regulations on land held by tribal members within the boundary of the reservation.
You must be logged in to post a comment.