Here:
Tribes, Same-Sex Marriage, and Obergefell v. Hodges: Tweedy on Same Sex Marriage
Implementing VAWA 2013: Leonhard on Implementing VAWA
Here:
Tribes, Same-Sex Marriage, and Obergefell v. Hodges: Tweedy on Same Sex Marriage
Implementing VAWA 2013: Leonhard on Implementing VAWA
Jessica Intermill has published “Competing Sovereigns: Circuit Courts’ Varied Approaches to Federal Statutes in Indian Country” in the September 2015 issue of the Federal Lawyer. The article details the Sixth Circuit’s varied approaches in Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Tribal Government v. NLRB and NLRB v. Soaring Eagle Casino and Resort (en banc petition materials here).
Here:
Diversely Native
Many federal Indian law professors have experienced some version of the following: We go to a law school to give a workshop on a specific aspect of federal Indian law and get a question along the lines of …
and…
“Indian Law and Order Commission Proposals Gain Ground” by Troy Eid and Affie Ellis
The annual Indian Law issue of the Federal Lawyer — which includes an article on Native veterans-active duty servicemembers by Kate Fort and Peter Vicaire — is here:









Kathryn E. Fort and Peter S. Vicaire have posted “The Invisible Families: Child Welfare and American Indian Active Duty Servicemembers and Veterans,” forthcoming in the Federal Lawyer.
The abstract:
Child welfare issues as they involve Native military families are rarely discussed. In the recent case of Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, the Supreme Court erased them entirely. The federal government, tribes and states can address issues affecting Native military families in a number of ways discussed in this article, including:
• Kinship placement in contested adoptions put on hold due to deployment;
• Ensuring Memorandums of Understanding between military bases and states include reference to the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA);
• Identifying and educating attorneys — including Judge Advocates — on both ICWA and the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act;
• Training Veteran Treatment Court judges on issues specific to Native veterans;
• Modeling specialized state Indian Child Welfare Act dockets on Veteran Treatment Courts;
• Opening conversations between child welfare courts and veterans courts, and assigning one judge per family;
• Encouraging the development of tribal court veterans treatment dockets and engaging with the Veterans Administration (VA) through Veteran Justice Outreach Specialists (VJOs)
Here.
Judicial Profiles of Tribal Judges (!)
And excellent Indian law articles:
Here.
Recognizing the Importance of Indian Law on State Bar Examinations
In many areas of federal Indian law, practitioners must understand substantive principles coupled with the unique relationship between tribal nations and the United States at the federal and state level of government.
Full Story
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act at 25: Successes,Shortcomings, and Dilemmas
This article explains the political context at the time the IGRA was enacted, the pros and the cons of IGRA from a tribal perspective, the major unresolved legal issues IGRA has generated, and the potential collateral damages IGRA has created for tribal sovereignty.
Focus On: Understanding Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 and Its Application in the Sovereign Immunity Cases
The familiar concept that federally recognized Indian tribes are protected by sovereign immunity leads to interesting and confusing results in cases interpreting Rule 19 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure—Required Joinder of Parties.
Apocalypse Now: The Unrelenting Assault on Morton v. Mancari
It has become axiomatic within federal Indian law circles that if possible, tribal cases should not be taken to the U.S. Supreme Court. Of the Court’s last 30 tribally related decisions, tribal interests have only prevailed six times. Many of the losses were by wide margins and overturned significant and long standing principles of federal Indian law.
Freeing Indian Energy Development from the Grips of Cotton: Advancing Energy Independence for Tribal Nations
A substantial amount of untapped energy resources are located within Indian country in the United States. Energy production from tribal lands equals 10 percent of the total federal onshore production of energy minerals. Indian-owned energy resources are still largely undeveloped: 1.81 million acres are being explored or in production, but about 15 million more acres of energy resources are undeveloped.
Here.

The Potential Impact of the Growing Mobile Society on Tribal Identity (Venus McGhee Prince)
In Memoriam: David Getches: A Tribute to a Leader and a Scholar (Matthew L.M. Fletcher and Kristen A. Carpenter)
Garden of Truth (Sarah Deer)
California v. Cabazon Band: A Quarter-Century of Complex, Litigious Self-Determination (Matthew L.M. Fletcher)I’ve posted my short paper, “California v. Cabazon Band: A Quarter-Century of Complex, Litigious Self-Determination,” in this month’s Federal Lawyer on SSRN.
Here is the abstract:
The Supreme Court’s decision in California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987), may be the most momentous decision in federal Indian law in the last 50 years. The decision provided a federal common law basis for Indian tribes to engage in high stakes bingo and other gaming activities without state regulation, even in so-called Public Law 280 states like California that have criminal jurisdiction inside of Indian country. Cabazon Band provoked Congress to finally codify a regulatory scheme for Indian gaming, including an enactment that authorized under specific conditions Vegas-style casino gaming, in the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, 25 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq. Indian gaming, as a direct result of Cabazon Band, now has a market greater than $26 billion a year nationally.
The March/April 2008 issue of the Federal Lawyer featured several articles on Indian law.
Zeke Fletcher on the legacy of Martinez, Wheeler, and Oliphant: trappedinthespringof1978
Casey Douma on the Indian Civil Rights Act: 40thanniversaryoficra
Mike McBride and Susan Huntsman on tribal labor relations: organizedlaborstrategiesforindiangaming
Goodman and Maxfield on the NIGC’s gaming management contracting: isthatyourfinalanswergoodmanmaxfield
Matthew Fletcher on the Supreme Court and the rule of law: supremecourtandtheruleoflaw
You must be logged in to post a comment.