Here is the order in Chinook Indian Nation v. Zinke (W.D. Wash.):
Materials here,
in Chinook Indian Nation v. Zinke (W.D. Wash.):
Complaint here.
Here are the materials in Nipmuc Nation v. Zinke (D. Mass.):
Here is the order in Burt Lake Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians v. Zinke (D.D.C.):
Briefs here.
Here are some details on this as yet non-recognized tribe:
Here are the materials in JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. v. Khamsanvong (E.D. Cal.):
Here is the complaint in Tolowa Nation v. United States (N.D. Cal.):
Here are the materials in Bruette v. Secretary of the Interior (E.D. Wis.):
Here:
Questions presented:
1. Whether a tribe that opted out of the Indian Reorganization Act can have its status under the Act revived under the Indian Land Consolidation Act, 25 U.S.C. § 2202, even though the United States did not hold land in trust for that tribe at the time the tribe sought a land-in-trust acquisition.
2. Whether the land-in-trust provision of the Indian Reorganization Act, 25 U.S.C. § 5108, exceeds Congress’ authority under the Indian Commerce Clause, Art. I, § S, cl. 3.
3. Whether § 5108’s standardless delegation of authority to acquire land “for Indians” is an unconstitutional delegation of legislative power.
4. Whether the federal government’s control over state land must be categorically exclusive for the Enclave Clause, Art. I, § 8, cl. 17, to prohibit the removal of that land from state jurisdiction.
You must be logged in to post a comment.