Link: Previous posts
Here are further materials and briefs in the matter of Pueblo of Pojoaque v. State of New Mexico, 16-cv-00625 (D. NM):
Here are the materials in Pueblo of Pojoaque v. State of New Mexico (D.N.M.):
60-nm-motion-to-dismiss-count-iv
65-nm-motion-to-modify-pi-order
71-motion-to-dismiss-counts-iii-iv
Prior posts here, here, and here.
Tenth Circuit materials here.
Here are the materials in North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians v. State of California (E.D. Cal.):
Prior order here.
Here are the materials in Pueblo of Pojoaque v. State of New Mexico (D. N.M.):
53 Pojoaque Motion for Contempt
115 DCT Order
An excerpt:
The Court will deny the Motion. First, although the Plaintiffs are not required to demonstrate that they suffered actual damages, such damages would help them to establish that the deferrals constitute threats. Second, the deferrals do not “threaten” the vendors within Judge Brack’s PI’s meaning. The Gaming Board, however, treads perilously close to civil contempt and should take care not to interfere with the Plaintiffs’ vendors.
Here are the materials in Estom Yumeka Maidu Tribe of the Enterprise Rancheria v. State of California (E.D. Cal.):
14-1 Tribe Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings
This is the IGRA good faith suit brought by the tribe in the Northern District of Florida:
Doc. 25 – Order on cross-motions for judgment on the pleadings
Other documents posted previously here.
Here is the complaint in Seminole Tribe of Florida v. State of Florida (N.D. Fla.):
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.