Section 1303 Tribal Court Exhaustion — Bercier v. Turtle Mountain Tribal Court

bercier-v-turtle-mountain-tribal-court

State v. Beasley — Idaho Court of Appeals Affirms Conviction at Fort Hall

Here is the opinion. An excerpt:

The district court did not err by denying Beasley’s motion to dismiss. Trooper Winans was not outside his jurisdiction when he arrested Beasley, as the state and the Shoshone-Bannock tribes share concurrent jurisdiction over Interstate 15 where it crosses the Fort Hall Indian Reservation. Furthermore, the tribal extradition code does not apply to arrests by state agents in areas of concurrent jurisdiction. Therefore, the arrest was not illegal and the district court was not required to relinquish jurisdiction over Beasley. Beasley’s judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Cohen v. Winkelman — Tenth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of ICRA Claim against Tribal College

Here is the opinion, unpublished, from the Tenth Circuit. The court affirmed the dismissal of the claim, which was a claim of wrongful employment termination, on the basis of tribal sovereign immunity. The court specifically rejected the so-called Dry Creek Lodge exception.

US v. Boise — Challenge to Confession Obtained by Tribal Police

Here’s an Indian Civil Rights Act-related case out of the District of Oregon involving a motion to suppress a statement obtained by tribal police to be used as evidence in federal court. The motion was denied.

boise-motion-to-suppress

us-response-to-boise-motion

boise-reply-brief

us-v-boise-dct-order-denying-motion-to-suppress

5th Annual Indigenous Law Conference at MSU October 10-11

Here are the exciting details!

Friday, October 10, 2008

8:30 – 8:40 a.m. Opening: Asiniins Singers

8:40 – 9:00 a.m. Welcome and Introduction by Dean Joan W. Howarth

9:00 – 10:00 a.m. Keynote Speaker: Lawrence Baca

10:15 – 12:15 p.m. Indigenous Women Assess the Indian Civil Rights Act

Moderator: Sheena Oxendine

Rebecca Miles, Eva Petoskey, Rina Swentzell, Gloria Valencia Weber, Francine Hatch

1:15 – 3:00 p.m. Gender and Race

Moderator: Hannah Bobee

Angela Riley, Ann Tweedy, Sonia Katyal

3:30 – 4:30 p.m. Commentary on the Indian Civil Rights Act

Moderator: Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Catharine MacKinnon

8:00 p.m. Literary Event

Frank Pommersheim

Gordon Henry

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Continue reading

Maldonado v. Yakama Tribal Gaming — ICRA Case Dismissed

The Eastern District of Washington dismissed a claim under the Indian Civil Rights Act brought by a fired employee of the Yakama Tribal Gaming Corporation. The court rejected the application of the so-called Dry Creek Lodge doctrine.

Here is the order.

DCT Takes Jurisdiction over Snoqualmie Banishment Question

H/T Indianz

snoqualmie-dct-order

Here are the materials and briefs.

Snoqualmie Tribal Leadership Dispute in Federal Court

Here is the news article. An excerpt:

A federal judge might be the last hope for banished members of the Snoqualmie Tribe who appeared in court Tuesday in their effort to regain tribal membership.

U.S. District Court Judge James L. Robart said he would issue a written ruling later as to whether the case is even properly before him or should be dismissed.

Only then — if he rules in favor of the banished members — would he get to the merits of the case.

And here are the materials:

petition-for-writ-of-habeas-corpus

snoqualmie-rule-19-motion-to-dismiss [!!!]

snoqualmie-motion-to-dismiss

plaintiffs-response-to-motion-to-dismiss

snoqualmie-reply-brief

Patrick Garry et al. on Tribal Incorporation of First Amendment Norms

Patrick M. Garry (South Dakota), Candice Spurling (South Dakota), Jennifer Keating (South Dakota), and Derek Nelson (South Dakota) have posted “Tribal Incorporation of First Amendment Norms: A Case Study of the Indian Tribes of South Dakota” on SSRN, recently published in the South Dakota Law Review.

From the abstract:

This article analyzes how Indian tribal courts have incorporated First Amendment norms within tribal legal systems. Given the more traditionally communal nature of tribal societies, Indian tribal courts have taken a slightly different approach to the kind of individual rights articulated in the First Amendment. As this article demonstrates, tribal courts have elevated community interest and values when considering individual rights issues. The ways in which those interests and values have been elevated may prove instructive to those who advocate a more balanced approach to First Amendment freedoms within the U.S. judicial system.

The article examines the legal obligation imposed on Indian tribes to protect certain individual rights, and whether the First Amendment applies to Indian tribes, and finally how the Indian Civil Rights Act applies. The article analyzes how federal courts have interpreted the Indian Civil Rights Act and surveys Indian tribal court decisions concerning individual rights issues such as free speech, free press, and free exercise of religion.

The final part of the article analysis turns away from reported tribal court decisions and focuses on tribal political, social, and cultural issues relating to First Amendment-type rights. In this respect, the article focuses exclusively on the nine tribes of South Dakota, exploring how First Amendment-type issues have arisen within those tribes and how they have been resolved outside of the judicial system.

Registration for 5th Annual Indigenous Law Conference

Registration for the ILPC’s 5th Annual Indigenous Law Conference, Forty Years of the Indian Civil Rights Act, is now available online here.