Tag Archives: First Amendment
Here are the materials in Dakota Rural Action v. Noem (D.S.D.): 1 Complaint 1-1 (Exhibit A Rioting Boosting Act)
Oklahoma American Indian Arts and Crafts Sales Act of 1974 Struck Down [definition of “Indian” more restrictive than federal law]
Here are the materials in Fontenot v. Hunter (W.D. Okla.): 1 Complaint 33 Ps Motion for Summary Judgment 35 Oklahoma Motion for Summary Judgment 39 Ps Response 41 State Response 42 State Reply 43 Ps Reply 47 DCT Order An … Continue reading →
Leonard Peltier Free Speech Claims against State of Washington for Removing His Paintings from Exhibit Survive Summary Judgment Motion
Here are the materials in Peltier v. Sacks (W.D. Wash.): 42 defendant motion for summary j 51 response 52-4 painting one 52-5 painting two 52-6 painting three 53 reply 54 dct order Earlier post on this matter here.
ATL: State Legislatures Trying to Use Dakota Access Pipeline Protests as Excuse for Statutory Limits on Progressive or Anti-Fascist Speech
Here are the materials in Pro-Football, Inc. v. Blackhorse (E.D. Va.): 53 DCT Order on Briefing Schedule 56 Pro-Football Motion for Summary J on Constitutional Claims 71 Blackhorse Motion for Partial Summary J 100 Pro-Football Cross Motion 106 Blackhorse Second … Continue reading →
Federal Court Affirms Oklahoma School’s Refusal to Allow Native High School Graduate to Wear Eagle Feather on Graduation Cap
Here is the order in Griffith v. Caney Valley Public Schools (N.D. Okla.): 22. Order and Opinion (5-20-15) Prior materials here.
Federal Circuit to Decide En Banc if Lanham Act § 2(a) Banning “Disparaging” Marks is Constitutional
Here are the materials in In re Tam: CAFED Panel Opinion Sue Sponte Hearing En Banc Order Panel materials: Tam Opening Brief USPTO Brief Tam Reply
Here is the opening brief in Pro-Football Inc. v. Blackhorse (E.D. Va.): 53 DCT Order on Briefing Schedule 56 Pro-Football Motion for Summary J on Constitutional Claims According to the briefing schedules, briefs are going to be flying fast and … Continue reading →
Here is the opinion in Native American Council of Tribes v. Weber. An excerpt: In this appeal, we consider the South Dakota Department of Corrections’ (“SDDOC”) decision to prohibit tobacco use by Native American inmates during religious activities. In 2009, … Continue reading →
Here are the new materials in Native American Council of Tribes v. Weber (D. S.D.): DCT Order on Stay and Attorney Fees Prior materials are here, here, here, and here.