Here:
Reply TK
Lower court materials here.
Indian Health Service
Maniilaq Association Wins ISDEAA Dispute with HHS
Here are the materials in Maniilaq Association v. Burwell (D. D.C.):
17 Maniilaq Motion for Summary J
An excerpt:
Plaintiff Maniilaq Association (“Maniilaq” or “plaintiff”) administers healthcare systems through a self-determination compact and annual funding agreements under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (“ISDEAA”), 25 U.S.C. § 458aaa, et seq. Plaintiff is seeking a declaration that a lease with the Indian Health Service (“IHS” or “defendant”) for one of the clinics Maniilaq operates under its self-determination contract is incorporated into Maniilaq’s 2013 funding agreement as a matter of law. Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment.1 For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and DENIES Defendant’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. An appropriate Order accompanies this opinion.
Federal Court Denies Government’s Motion to Dismiss Tuba City Regional’s Contract Support Costs Claims against IHS
Here are the materials in Tuba City Regional Health Care Corp. v. United States (D.D.C.):
32 DCT Order Denying US Motion to Dismiss
WaPo: BIA/IHS Fail to Pay Contract Support Costs
Here.
An excerpt:
At issue are contract support costs that are spelled out in the agreements, under which the government pays tribes to run education, public safety and health programs on reservations. The support costs — which include items like travel expenses, legal and accounting fees, insurance costs and worker’s compensation fees — typically account for 20 percent of the value of the contract, according to Lloyd Miller, a lawyer who represented the tribes at the Supreme Court.
Application for Exemption for American Indians and Alaska Natives and Other Individuals who are Eligible to Receive Services from an Indian Health Care Provider
Here.
Federal Court Dismisses Slip-and-Fall Action against Indian Health Service in Eagle Butte
Here are the materials in Gunville v. United States (D. S.D.):
More Complaints against Indian Health Service over Contract Support Costs
Southcentral Foundation Effort to Force IHS to Fund Suicide Prevention and Other Programs Fails
Here are the materials in Southcentral Foundation v. Roubideaux (D. Alaska):
An excerpt:
Before the Court at Docket 3 is a motion filed by Plaintiff Southcentral Foundation (SCF). Although entitled a motion for a preliminary injunction, SCF is seeking mandamus relief in the form of an order that requires the immediate payment to it from a federal official of additional funding for Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 for the Methamphetamine and Suicide Prevention Initiative (MSPI) and the Domestic Violence Prevention Initiative (DVPI). The Defendant is Yvette Roubideaux, the Director of the Indian Health Service (“IHS” or “Defendant”). After this litigation was filed, IHS agreed to pay SCF approximately $1.08 million of the disputed funds. Still disputed is approximately $449,000 in funding. On September 27, 2013, the Court heard oral argument on the motion. Having considered the documents filed with the Court, the law, and the arguments of counsel, the Court will deny the motion for the reasons set forth herein.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.