Second Circuit Affirms Reduced Attorney Fees for Bond Schoeneck Firm for Oneida Land Claims

Here is the mandate and order:

CA2 Mandate and Order

And the briefs:

Bond Schoeneck Brief

Oneida Brief

Bond Schoeneck Reply Brief

The lower court materials are here.

News coverage here:

Circuit Upholds Reduction ofAttorney Fees in Indian Case_Article

Shinnecock Indian Nation Sues United States for $1.1Billion over Land Dispossession

Here is the complaint:

Shinnecock Complaint

Kawaiisu Tribe of the Tejon NAGPRA/Land Claims Dismissed

Here are the materials in Robinson v. Salazar (E.D. Cal.):

Robinson v. Salazar 3rd Amended Complaint

DCT Order Dismissing Robinson Clams

 

Kirsten Carlson on “Priceless Property” (Black Hills)

Kirsten Matoy Carlson has posted “Priceless Property,” forthcoming from the Georgia State University Law Review, on SSRN. Highly recommended!

Here is the abstract:

In 2011, the poorest Indians in the United States refused to accept over $1 billion dollars from the United States government. They reiterated their long held belief that money – even $1.3 billion dollars – could not compensate them for the taking of their beloved Black Hills. A closer look at the formation of the Sioux claim to the Black Hills helps us to understand why the Sioux Nation has repeatedly rejected over $1 billion dollars in compensation for land taken by the United States over 100 years ago. This article seeks to understand why the Sioux view the Black Hills as priceless by studying the formation of the Black Hills claim. It constructs a new, richer approach to understanding dispute formation by combining narrative analysis with the sociolegal framework for explaining dispute formation. The article argues that narratives enrich the naming, claiming, and blaming stages of dispute creation and illustrates the usefulness of this new approach through a case study of the Black Hills claim. It uses the autobiographical work of an ordinary Sioux woman to provide a narrative lens to the creation of the Sioux claim to the Black Hills. American Indian Stories by Zitkala-Sa presents a narrative of Sioux life around the time of the claims emergence. By contextualizing and humanizing the claim, my analysis provides insights into why the Sioux claim to the Black Hills emerged into a legal dispute and helps to explain why the Black Hills remain priceless property to the Sioux Nation today.

Alabama-Coushatta Tribes Sues US for Failure to Pay Land Claims Judgment

Here is the complaint:

Alabama-Coushatta Tribe v. United States

Kawaiisu Tribe of Tejon Land and NAGPRA Claims Dismissed

Here are the materials in Robinson v. Salazar (E.D. Cal.):

DCT Order on Salazar Motion to Dismiss

Salazar Motion to Dismiss

County of Kern Motion to Dismiss

Tejon Ranch Motion to Dismiss

Corrected Opposition to Tejon Ranch

Robinson Opposition to Salazar Motion

Law Firm Brief in Appeal of Oneida Land Claims Attorney Fees Award

Oneida Atty Fees Appeal Brief

The lower court materials are here.

Sand Hill Lenape Land Claim Fails

Here is the opinion in New Jersey Sand Hill Band of Lenape and Cherokee Indians v. State of New Jersey (D. N.J.):

NJ Sand Hill Band v. New Jersey

Interior Solicitor Letter on Stockbridge-Munsee Gaming Compact Denial: Denying US Participation in Land Claims Settlement

Here: Vele.Tompkins.02.18.2011.

The DOI Letter is here.

News Coverage on Oneida Land Claim

From How Appealing:

“Appeals court dismisses Oneida Indians’ 40-year-old land claim”: The Syracuse Post-Standard contains this article today.

The Oneida Daily Dispatch reports today that “Appeals court dismisses land claim.”

And The Utica Observer-Dispatch contains an article headlined “Court: No need for state to compensate Oneidas on land; Appeals judges reverse key element of ’07 claim ruling.”

You can access yesterday’s ruling of a divided three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit at this link.