ALJ Rules against Saginaw Chippewa in NLRB Jurisdiction Case

Here:

Administrative Law Judge’s Decision

ACS Issue Brief on the NLRB — Holy Irony!!!!

The American Constitution Society just released an issue brief called “Understanding How Employees’ Rights to Organize Under the National Labor Relations Act Have Been Limited:  The Case of Brown University.” Anyone following Indian Law knows that not all employees have this problem!

Here it is: dannin-issue-brief

Just take the words “Brown University” and replace them with “San Manuel Indian Bingo and Casino” and you have a wildly different result. This issue brief, which is well-written, notes how the NLRB ignores precedent to reach pro-employer results and harms employee rights. Unfortunately, there is no mention of the San Manuel Indian Bingo and Casino decision (from the same year as the Brown University decision, 2004), which reversed 30 years of precedent, gave short shrift to tribal sovereignty, and utterly ignored the governmental purposes of tribal gaming.

I haven’t seen any issue briefs on Indian Law from the ACS, an organization I support. I suppose it’s not a major issue for the ACS, but I urge the ACS and its issue brief writers to consider Indian Law on occasion. Dean Getches wrote a decade ago that tribal interests fare worse than any class of litigant before the Supreme Court, worse than convicted criminals, and not much has changed to the benefit of tribal interests.

Here are a few things the ACS could write about:

  • The 75 percent loss rate of tribal interests before the SCT since 1986
  • The hostility of the Supreme Court toward tribal criminal and civil jurisdiction over non-Indians, which contributes directly to a serious crime and regulatory problem in Indian Country
  • The hostility of the Supreme Court toward tribal interests in disputes with states and state agencies (a federalism issue )
  • The incredible advances that tribes (and states and local governments) have made in using intergovernmental agreements to negotiate away troublesome jurisdictional quandries
  • The hostility of the federal government toward Indians and Indian tribes in the context of Indian gaming and individual Indian money accounts
  • The voting rights cases still being brought by the ACLU Voting Rights Project in Indian Country

There are many other issues. There’s a lot of good things going on in Indian Country, too.

Foxwoods Appeal Filed

Here is the appeal document.

ICT: Saginaw Chippewa vs. the Unions

From ICT:

MOUNT PLEASANT, Mich. – In an effort to ward off unionization efforts under the federal National Labor Relations Act, some tribes have adopted labor laws that allow employees to organize under tribal law. The Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe has taken a different approach.

”The position of this tribe is that the National Labor Relations Act does not apply to Indian tribes and the National Labor Relations Board does not have jurisdiction, and, that being the case, we don’t believe we have to adopt an ordinance that allows union organizing to occur. The ordinance the tribe adopted prohibits union organizing,” said Saginaw Chippewa attorney Sean Reed.

Continue reading

Sovereignty and NLRB Subpoenas

Does the National Labor Relations Board have authority to issue subpoenas to tribal cops?

From the New London Day:

Sovereignty Takes Center Stage in NLRB Hearing

HARTFORD – Today’s National Labor Relations Board hearing on the unionization of casino dealers began with a fiery debate on sovereign immunity.

Continue reading

Foxwoods to Challenge Union Vote

From the New London Day:

NLRB Set To Hear Challenge Of Foxwoods’ Union

Testimony starts Tuesday during Hartford hearing

It is a contentious battle, which pits an Indian tribe that operates one of the most successful casinos in the world against one of the largest unions in North America.

Continue reading

Saginaw Chippewa Union Vote

From Indianz:

Saginaw Chippewa casino workers reject union

Housekeeping staff at the casino owned by the Saginaw Chippewa Tribe of Michigan voted down a union by a 2-1 margin on Thursday. Nearly all the full- and part-time housekeeping staff at the Soaring Eagle Casino & Resort participated in the election. They voted against joining the Teamsters union by 192 to 88. The National Labor Relations Board oversaw the election, the second of its kind at a tribal casino. Dealers at the Foxwoods Resort Casino, owned by the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation of Connecticut, voted overwhelmingly last month to join the United Auto Workers.

Get the Story:
Teamsters turned down by casino workers (The Mt. Pleasant Morning Sun 12/21)

Mashantucket Pequot Defense of Tribal Union Law

From the Connecticut Day:

Balancing The Rights Of Workers, Tribe

By Michael J. Thomas 

We know you have been following recent events here at Mashantucket involving union activity. We are writing to you so that you might understand the position of the tribal nation, and hopefully understand that just as you are concerned with the rights of our workers, so are we.

Continue reading

Interesting Legal Argument on Unions in Tribal Casinos

From the blog On the Wings of Eagles….

Saginaw Chippewa Union Vote

From Indianz:

 Union vote set for Saginaw Chippewa casino

The National Labor Relations Board will oversee a union election at the casino owned by the Saginaw Chippewa Tribe of Michigan. The election takes place December 20. Teamsters Local 486 wants to organize about 300 housekeeping employees. This the second NLRB-overseen election at a tribal casino since the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the board’s ability to assert jurisdiction at tribal enterprises. Dealers at the casino owned by the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation of Connecticut agreed to a union this past weekend.

Get the Story:
Union election date set for casino workers (The Mt. Pleasant Morning Sun 11/29)