Here is the indictment in United States v. Crosby (E.D. Cal.):
News coverage here.
Here is the indictment in United States v. Crosby (E.D. Cal.):
News coverage here.
Here is the order in Freeman v. Freeman (Paskenta Tribal Court):
PTCV-14-001-2014-5-29 – Preliminary Injunction Order
Materials here.
Here are the new materials in Freeman v. Freeman (Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians Tribal Court):
PTCV-14-001 – 2014-5-27 Motion for Preliminary Injuction and Default Judgment
PTCV-14-001 – 2014-5-27 – Declaration of M Jones
PTCV-14-001 – 2014-5-27 – Second Declaration of G. Freeman
Prior posts on this issue here, here, and here.
And a related document:
Here are the materials in Swearinger v. Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians Tribal Business Council (N.D. Cal.):
DCT Order Dismissing Complaint
Paskenta Band Motion to Dismiss
An excerpt:
Plaintiffs are “enrolled members of the Paskenta Band of Nomlaki Indians,” a federally recognized Indian tribe with “approximately 240 members.” Docket No. 1, Compl. ¶¶ 11, 13-14. Although Congress revoked PBNI’s status as a federally recognized tribe in 1958, it later restored the tribe’s federally recognized status in 1994 by enacting the Paskenta Band Restoration Act (PBRA), Pub. L. No. 103-454, §§ 301-03, 108 Stat. 4791 (codified as amended at 25 U.S.C. §§ 1300m et seq.). Compl. ¶ 21. The PBRA directed the Secretary of the Interior to conduct an “election for the purpose of adopting a constitution and bylaws for the Tribe.” 25 U.S.C. § 1300m-6. The PBRA further states that, after the tribe adopts a constitution, “such tribal constitution shall govern membership in the Tribe.” Id. § 1300m-4(b).