Here are the materials in Robinson v. United States (E.D. Cal.):
US Motion to Dismiss Robinson Complaint
US Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss
This case has already been dismissed before, see here.
Here are the materials in Robinson v. United States (E.D. Cal.):
US Motion to Dismiss Robinson Complaint
US Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss
This case has already been dismissed before, see here.
The Navajo motion to intervene in this suit is here.
The updated materials:
Here:
Navajo Opposition to EEOC Conditional Cert Petition
Peabody Coal Opposition to EEOC Conditional Cert Petition
The EEOC’s conditional petition is here.
The original cert petitions from Navajo and Peabody are here.
Here is the federal brief:
Cert petitions are here. CA9 opinion post is here.
This dispute arises from the Poarch Band’s high stakes bingo operations. Poarch Band was not named.
The case is Hardy v. IGT (M.D. Ala.):
Multimedia Games Motion to Dismiss
Here is the opinion in Different Horse v. Salazar and Rosebud Sioux Tribe (D. S.D.):
And the briefs:
Here:
Gila River v Lyon Cert Petition
Here are the questions presented:
I. Whether, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19(b), courts may adjudicate and compromise legal rights in land to which the United States holds title without the United States’ participation in the litigation.
II. Whether, in light of this Court’s recent decision in United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation, No. 10-382 (June 13, 2011), the Ninth Circuit properly held, as a matter of law, that litigation compromising the United States’ title in land can proceed in the United States’ absence as long as an Indian tribe is a party to the litigation.
Here are the materials in Center for Biological Diversity v. Pizarchik (D. Colo.):
You must be logged in to post a comment.