Here.
San Juan County
Salt Lake Tribune: “Split appears in San Juan as new Navajo-led County Commission moves to support an even bigger Bears Ears than Trump shrunk”
Here.
Salt Lake Tribune Editorial: “It’s time for San Juan County’s white residents to speak up for their American Indian neighbors”
Here. Try going through google news if the link doesn’t work.
Diné CARE Prevails in NEPA Challenge to Navajo Mine Expansion
Here are the materials in Diné Citizens against Ruining Our Environment v. United States Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (D. Colo.):
News coverage here.
Posts on prior motion to dismiss and motion to intervene.
Federal Court Denies Navajo Rule 19 Motion in Diné CARE v. US Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
Update in Navajo Dine CARE v. Salazar Suit re Navajo Mine — Additional Update (11/6/12)
Here are the updated materials:
Navajo Intervention and Motion to Dismiss post
Update: FINAL 2012-10-18 Dine C.A.R.E.,et al. v. Salazar Not. Supp. Auth.
Update in Diné CARE v. Salazar
Here is Navajo’s latest pleading (limited motion to intervene and motion to dismiss):
FINAL COMBINED NAVAJO NATION AREA IV PLEADINGS
The complaint is here.
Diné CARE File Another Suit to Stop Coal Mine at Navajo Mine
Here is the complaint in Diné Citizens against Ruining Our Environment v. United States Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (D. Colo.):
Our posting on the related and previous suit is here.
Montezuma Creek Clinic Plaintiffs Ask Navajo Supreme Court to Ignore Tenth Circuit Ruling
From the Salt Lake Tribune:
Federal appeals court judges have said a Navajo tribal court can’t force the San Juan County-owned Montezuma Creek Clinic to rehire employees who alleged they were wrongfully terminated.
But three former employees won’t take no for an answer.
In March, they asked the Navajo Supreme Court to instruct tribal courts to ignore that ruling from the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals [Supreme Court Project materials] — and to order the clinic to pay fines totaling more than $26 million. In addition, the ex-workers want their former employer to pay their attorneys’ fees for the past nine years.
