Order list here. Prior post detailing the other petitions here.
Here are the materials in Oklahoma v. Davis, a petition in which Oklahoma only asked to overrule McGirt:
There are a bunch more denials of Oklahoma’s brilliant papering strategy (we’ll post materials later, cuz we have lives and Tribal Law won’t teach itself . . . or will it?):
Oh and because we can’t have nice things, the Court granted the Harvard affirmative action case, too.
Here is today’s order.
The grant is limited to question 1 — here are the questions presented:
Cert stage materials in Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta:
Lower court materials:
Here is today’s order list. See prior post here.
The Court denied cert in two McGirt-related petitions filed by prisoners:
Bentley v. Oklahoma: Bentley Petition
White v. Oklahoma: White Petition
The petitions in Haggerty, Stand Up, GRE Six Nations, and Tanner were all denied (see prior post).
The court also denied three McGirt-related petitions from Oklahoma prisoners:
Parish Petition/Amicus/BIO/Reply
Several Indian law cert petitions are set for discussion today at the Supreme Court’s conference (which is their fancy way of saying they’re meeting as a group of 9 to discuss pending cases; where they decide whether or not to accept a cert petition). Here’s a list:
Grand River Six Nations Enterprises Ltd. v. Boughton
Several of the McGirt-related petitions
The fun keeps going next week:
Klickitat County v. Yakama Nation Cert Petition
And the week after that:
All the briefs are here. The Court will first consider the case at this Friday’s conference (1/7).
Here.
Here is the opinion in Herrera v. State of Wyoming:
State SCT cert stage briefs:
ResponseObjection – Petition for review
Prior post here.
Here is the petition in Jamestown S’Klallam Tribe v. Lummi Nation:
Question presented:
The question presented is whether the Ninth Circuit—in conflict with decisions of this Court and other courts—properly abrogated the long-settled and original understanding of a central treaty term, without any legal or factual basis for doing so, and while redefining the boundary of a major body of water to accommodate its novel treaty interpretation.
Lower court materials here.
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.