Here is the unpublished opinion in Stillaguamish Indian Tribe v. Upper Skagit Indian Tribe.
Briefs here.

Here is the unpublished opinion in Stillaguamish Indian Tribe v. Upper Skagit Indian Tribe.
Briefs here.

Here are the materials in United States v. Washington, subproceeding 24-01 (W.D. Wash.):

Here is the order in United States v. Washington, subproceeding 17-03 (W.D. Wash.):
Briefs are here.
Seattle Times did an incredible profile of the case and its legacy back in January.







Charles F. Wilkinson and the University of Washington Press have published “Treaty Justice: The Northwest Tribes, the Boldt Decision, and the Recognition of Fishing Rights.”

Blurb:
In 1974, Judge George Boldt issued a ruling that affirmed the fishing rights and tribal sovereignty of Native nations in Washington State. The Boldt Decision transformed Indigenous law and resource management across the United States and beyond. Like Brown v. Board of Education, the case also brought about far-reaching societal changes, reinforcing tribal sovereignty and remedying decades of injustice.
Eminent legal historian and tribal advocate Charles Wilkinson tells the dramatic story of the Boldt Decision against the backdrop of salmon’s central place in the cultures and economies of the Pacific Northwest. In the 1960s, Native people reasserted their fishing rights as delineated in nineteenth-century treaties. In response, state officials worked with non-Indian commercial and sport fishing interests to forcefully—and often violently—oppose Native actions. These “fish wars” spurred twenty tribes and the US government to file suit in federal court. Moved by the testimony of tribal leaders and other experts, Boldt pointedly waited until Lincoln’s birthday to hand down a decision recognizing the tribes’ right to half of the state’s fish. The case’s long aftermath led from the Supreme Court’s affirmation of Boldt’s opinion to collaborative management of the harvest of salmon and other marine resources.
Expert and compelling, Treaty Justice weaves personalities and local detail into the definitive account of one of the twentieth century’s most important civil rights cases.
Here is the opinion in Swinomish Indian Community v. Lummi Nation.
Briefs here. Lower court materials here.

Here is the opinion in Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Sauk-Suiatte Indian Tribe.
Briefs and so on here.

You must be logged in to post a comment.