Here are the materials in Wopsock v. Dalton (D. Utah):
Ute Indian Tribe
Tribal Opposition to Trump Administration’s Motion to Change Venue in Bears Ears Matter to Utah
Here is the pleading in Hopi Tribe v. Trump (D.D.C.):
Doc. 26 Plaintiffs’ Opposition to Federal Defendants’ Motion to Transfer 2018-02-01
The motion is here.
Administration Moves for Transfer to Utah in Bears Ears
Here is the motion in Hopi Tribe et al v. Donald J. Trump et al, 17-cv-02590 (D.D.C.):
21 – Federal Defendants’ Motion to Transfer Case to the District of Utah
Link: Case Archive
Five Tribes Complaint against Trump over Bears Ears
Here is the complaint in Hopi Tribe et al. v. Trump (D.D.C.):
Update on the parallel suit involving Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument: Wilderness Society v. Trump is here
Hackford v. Utah Cert Petition (Ute Reservation Boundaries)
Here:
Questions presented:
1. Whether the Acts of Congress, authorizing the President to set apart and reserve any reservoir site or other lands necessary to conserve and protect the water supply for the Indians or for general agricultural development, diminished the Uintah and Ouray Reservation.
2. Whether as used in 18 U.S.C. § 1151(a), the term “Indian Country” includes the National Forest land, and the right of way running through the National Forest lands where the alleged criminal conduct occurred, for purpose of federal criminal jurisdiction.
Lower court materials here.
Federal Court Dismisses Dispute over Nonmember Property Boundary Line Dispute on Ute Reservation
Here are the materials in Austin v. Dietz (D. Utah):
12-2 Motion to Dismiss First Tribal Court Suit
12-3 Motion to Dismiss Second Tribal Court Suit
12-4 Tribal Court Panel Decision
Tenth Circuit Rejects Challenge to State Criminal Jurisdiction on Strawberry Valley Project Area of Ute Reservation
Here is the opinion in Hackford v. State of Utah.
Briefs:
Cert Petition Arising from Police Killing of Ute Tribal Member
Here is the petition in Jones v. Norton:
Questions presented:
- Where it is undisputed that Plaintiffs/Petitioners Debra Jones and Arden Jones, and their deceased son Todd R. Murray, all had individual rights under the 1868 Ute Tribe treaty with the United States, and where, under the procedural posture of this case, it is undisputed that Plaintiffs’ and their Decedent son’s individual rights under the Treaty were violated, did Plaintiffs state a claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 based on the violation of their treaty rights?
- 2.Where State police officers have pursued an Indian within Indian country without either probable cause or jurisdictional authority can they be relieved of the common law duty to preserve evidence simply because the officers’ tortious conduct giving rise to the claims against them arose within Indian country?
- 3.Where there are disputed material facts, can a district court grant summary judgment based upon the court’s opinion that a reasonable jury would decide the case in favor of the summary judgment movant?
Lower court materials here.
D. Wyoming Finds BLM Fracking Regulations Unlawful
Here are materials in Wyoming v. U.S. Dept. of Interior, et al, 15-cv-00043 (Jun. 21, 2016):
Doc. 180 – Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation Merits Brief
Doc. 193 – Federal Respondents’ Brief in Response to Merits Briefs of Industry and State Petitioners
Doc. 207 – Order on Petitions for Review of Final Agency Action
The DOI and respondents have filed a leave to appeal.
Link to previous coverage here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.