Complaint here.
May 1, 2013 Return of Compact Amendment Letter here.
April 5, 2013 Settlement Agreement here.
August 1, 2013 Disapproval Letter here.
Nov. 6, 2013 Disapproval letter here.
News coverage via The Oklahoman here.
Here are the federal court filings so far in Comanche Nation v. Fallin (W.D. Okla.):
11 Oklahoma Motion to Vacate Arbitration
UPDATE (12/2/13):
2512486 – Nov 20 2013 Transcript of Hearing in Comanche Nation v Fallin – Hon Robin J Cauthron
An excerpt:
Pursuant to this Order, Defendants are hereby Ordered to recognize, honor, and implement the terms of the October 31, 2013, Compact with the Chickasaw Nation and all of its terms, including the tax apportionment formulas, as if that Compact were entered with Plaintiffs. Further, the State shall withdraw any tobacco stamps issued inconsistently with the terms of the 2013 Compact.
The Court finds that any tax loss to the State is easily recoupable, and because this Order will expire in three weeks, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(c), Plaintiffs shall post a bond in the amount of $25.00 within three days of the date of this Order.
Prior post here.
Here is the complaint in G2 v. Ponca Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma (W.D. Okla.):
An excerpt:
5. On March 1, 2010, the Ponca Tribe executed a “Construction Loan” in favor of G2 in the principal amount of $750,000.00, with a rider that all construction should be performed at cost plus 10%.
6. G2 performed all of its obligations under the Construction Loan contract.7. The Ponca Tribe had been substantially performing on this Construction Loan by making payments to G2 in the amount of $35,000.00 per month. See attached Exhibit 2.8. Despite G2’s notice of default and demand for repayment, the Ponca Tribe has defaulted on repayment pursuant to the terms of the Construction Loan. Said failure constitutes an event of default pursuant to the Construction Loan. The Ponca Tribe breached its contract with G2 by failing to make payments on the principal balance, and failing to otherwise cure the default.9. G2 has sustained damages in connection with the Ponca Tribe’s breach of contract.10. G2 has sustained damages and costs in connection with the Ponca Tribe’s continued use of its tax license, incurring fees and monies owed (OTC Case No. P-13-037-K).
11. G2 is entitled to recover damages it has sustained, including repayment of the remaining principal balance of $350,000.00, interest which continues to accrue, plus the expenses related to filing this action and reasonable attorneys’ fees.
Here are the new materials in Swanda Brothers Inc v. Chasco Constructors Ltd LLP (W.D. Okla.):
Kiowa Casino Operations Authority MTD
The court had previously dismissed Kiowa from the matter (see post here), but after discovery the parties found evidence of a waiver of immunity.
Here is the opinion in Cressman v. Thompson. Update — Now with dissent: 12-6151
An excerpt:
This appeal concerns an image stamped on the standard Oklahoma license plate ofa Native American shooting an arrow toward the sky. Appellant Keith Cressman objects to the image as a form of speech and wishes not to display it on his personal vehicles.But Oklahoma law imposes sanctions for covering up the image, and the state charges fees for specialty license plates without it—fees that Mr. Cressman does not want to pay. Because he must either display the image or pay additional fees, he argues that the state is compelling him to speak in violation of his First Amendment rights.
And the briefs:
Lower court materials here.
Here are the materials in Comanche Nation v. CDST Gaming-I Inc.:
Here is the order in Apache Tribe of Oklahoma v. TGS Anadarko (W.D. Okla.):
DCT Order Remanding to State Court
Prior materials were here.
Here are the materials in New Gaming Systems Inc. v. National Indian Gaming Commission (W.D. Okla.):
NIGC Final Decision — New Gaming & Sac and Fox
New Gaming Administrative Appeal
DCT ORDER affirming NIGC decision
Also:
The Cherokee Nation has voluntarily dismissed their claims against the feds in Cherokee Nation v. Nash:
Cherokee nation vs nash order 8 21 2012 feds
The feds have an outstanding counterclaim against the Nation and so they remain parties.
In the D.C. Circuit appeal, Vann v. Interior, here is Vann’s reply brief:
2012-08-30 Reply Brief of Appellants Marilyn Vann et al
Prior briefs are here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.