Here:
Doc. 16 and 16-1_Defs’ Motion to Dismiss (06.05.18)
Doc. 22_Pltf’s Response in Opp to Defs MTD (08.10.18)
Update:
Here are the newest materials in Keweenaw Bay Indian Community v. Khouri (W.D. Mich.):
152 state response to tribal motion for partial summary j
163 kbic reply in support of motion
200 motion for protective order
219 magistrate order re discovery
226 state motion for reconsideration of discovery order
235 kbic response to motion for reconsideration
240 magistrate order denying reconsideration
250 state notice of appeal re discovery order
Prior posts here.
Here is the opinion in Drabik v. Thomas:



Here are the materials in Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. ThinkFinance (E.D. La.):
Here.
Here:
The National Indian Law Library added new content to the Indian Law Bulletins on 8/8/18.
Law Review & Bar Journal Bulletin
http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/lawreviews/2018.html
Federal Courts Bulletin
http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2018.html
Carter v. Tahsuda (Indian Child Welfare Act – Constitutionality)
State of California v. Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel (Gaming; Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act)
Northern Natural Gas Company v. 80 Acres of Land in Thurston County (Utilities; Rights-of-Way – Condemnation)
Wilhite v. Awe Kualawaache Care Center (Jurisdiction; Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)
State Courts Bulletin
http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2018.html
State v. George (Jurisdiction)
Cayuga Nation v. Campbell (Official Tribal Government)
News Bulletin
http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.html
In the Land & Water section, we feature an article about a study on the changing scope of Native American groundwater rights.
U.S. Legislation Bulletin
http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/legislation/115_uslegislation.html
The following bills were added:
HR 3744 is here: CBO publication here and Bill here. It could replace the current procedures for federal recognition (for reference, here), but does not allow previously denied “Indian groups” from re-petitioning for federal recognition under the new act (if this bill passes), nor does it have an avenue to challenge a denial/negative finding.
You must be logged in to post a comment.