Here.
NYTs Obituary on Carter Camp, AIM Leader
Here.
Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Federal Court Rejects Narragansett Effort to Dismiss Attorney Fees Suit on Immunity Grounds
Here are the updated materials in Luckerman v. Narragansett Indian Tribe (D. R.I.):
18-1 Narragansett Motion for Reconsideration
22 DCT Order Denying Reconsideration
An excerpt:
On August 29, 2013, this Court denied Defendant Narragansett Indian Tribe’s (“Tribe”) motion to dismiss, but stayed adjudication of the case pending tribal exhaustion.1 Now, the Tribe has filed a motion for reconsideration of that decision (ECF No. 18), re-emphasizing the Tribe’s position that its tribal sovereign immunity bars the instant lawsuit, and asking again that the Court dismiss the claims brought by Plaintiff Douglas J. Luckerman. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion for reconsideration is DENIED.
Earlier, the federal court remanded the case to tribal court for exhaustion purposes, post here. Other lower court materials here and here.
Materials in New York v. Grand River Enterprises Six Nations & Native Wholesale Supply
Federal Court Denies Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment in Dispute over Oklahoma Indian Arrow License Plate
Here are the materials in Cressman v. Thompson (W.D. Okla.):
98 Cressman Motion for Summary J
111 DCT Order Denying Motions for Summary J
This case is slated for trial (!).
Tenth Circuit materials here. Earlier district court materials here.
Wyoming’s Petition Challenging EPA Decision on Wind River Reservation
Little Traverse Odawa Council Rejects Effort to Re-open Marriage Equality Question
Patent and Trademark Office Denies Trademark Protection for “Redskins Hog Rinds”
WaPo coverage here, with link to the PTO letter and attachments here.
Osage Supreme Court Decision in Red Eagle v. Red Corn & Osage Nation Congress
Here:
News coverage — “Path cleared for Osage chief’s impeachment trial” — here.
Nooksack COA Briefing in Roberts v. Kelly Complete
Tenth Circuit Reverses Conviction of Navajo Member for Second Degree Murder
Here are the materials in United States v. Toledo:
An excerpt:
Defendant–Appellant Dhanzasikam R. Toledo appeals from his conviction of voluntary manslaughter. 18 U.S.C. §§ 1112, 1153. Although the district court instructed the jury on second degree murder and voluntary manslaughter, it denied Mr. Toledo’s request for self-defense and involuntary manslaughter instructions. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse and remand for a new trial.
You must be logged in to post a comment.