Here:
Lower court materials here.
Here is the opinion in State of New Mexico v. Dept. of Interior.
Briefs here.
Here:
The National Indian Law Library added new content to the Indian Law Bulletins on 4/21/17.
U.S. Supreme Court Bulletin
http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2016-2017update.html
Petition was denied in Sun v. Mashantucket Pequot Gaming Enterprise (Jurisdiction) on 4/17/17.
U.S. Federal Courts Bulletin
http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2017.html
Havasupai Tribe v. Anasazi Water Company LLC (Indian Water Rights – Groundwater)
Tribal Courts Bulletin
http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2017.html
In the Matter of T. F. (Juvenile Law; Indian Civil Rights Act)
Sharp v. Red Elk (Civil Procedure)
State Courts Bulletin
http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2017.html
Advisory Opinion to the Attorney General RE: Voter Control of Gambling in Florida
In re J. L. (Indian Child Welfare Act – Notice)
In re Rhoades (Prisoners – Religious Freedom; Tobacco)
U.S. Regulatory Bulletin
http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/regulatory/2017.html
We feature a notice from the Bureau of Indian Affairs regarding rate adjustments for Indian irrigation projects.
News Bulletin
http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.html
In the Environment & Energy section, we feature an article about the impact of climate change on Native American tribes.
Law Review & Bar Journal Bulletin
http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/lawreviews/2017.html
The following articles were added:
The fate of tribal per capita payments in bankruptcy cases.
Escaping the ICWA penalty box: In defense of equal protection for Indian children.
[Dis]respecting the role of tribal courts.
Complexity’s Shadow: American Indian property, sovereignty, and the future.
Who owns our ancestors’ voices? Tribal claims to pre-1972 sound recordings.
Predicate offenses, foreign convictions, and trusting tribal courts.
ATL: “Katten Muchin Sued By Bottom-Feeding Former Client.”
Complaint in CashCall v. Katten Muchin Rosenman (Cal. Super Ct. — Orange County) here:
HT.
Here is the petition in Rothe v. Dept. of Defense:
Questions presented:
1. Whether a statutory program that requires an agency to distribute benefits to “socially disadvantaged individuals,” and defines “socially disadvantaged” in terms of membership in certain racial minority groups, classifies on the basis of race and is thus subject to strict scrutiny.2. Whether a statute that may not classify exclusively on the basis of race, but uses race as a factor in determining eligibility for benefits, is subject to strict scrutiny.
Lower court opinion here.
Here is the complaint in Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. McKesson Corp. (Cherokee Nation Dist. Ct.):
News coverage in WaPo: “Cherokee Nation sues drug firms, retailers for flooding communities with opioids.”
Here.
You must be logged in to post a comment.