Grant Christensen on Cultural Property as a Form of Collateral in a Secured Transaction Under the Model Tribal Secured Transactions Act

Grant Christensen has posted his paper, “Selling Stories or You Can’t Own This: Cultural Property as a Form of Collateral in a Secured Transaction Under the Model Tribal Secured Transactions Act,” on SSRN.

Here is the abstract:

The Model Tribal Secured Transactions Act was recently proposed by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. This article takes the position that the model act, if adopted, will encourage economic development in Indian Country by creating a set of uniform rules which both non-Indians and Indians can utilize to promote lending. Critically – before it is widely adopted, this article implores the NCCUSL to consider including in the model act – language that would protect tribal cultural property; and in the absence of such language, encourages tribes to modify the act to accomplish this protection. The stakes include the potential loss of priceless real and personal, tangible and intangible, cultural property which itself form the linchpin of both tribal identity and cultural expression for many indigenous communities in the United States and beyond.

Chippewa Cree Tribe Suit to Recover Arbitration Award from Tribally-Owned Payday Lending Management Company

Here is the complaint in Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy Reservation of Montana v. Encore Services LLC (D. Mont.):

1 Complaint + Exhibits

News coverage, “Tribal members funneled cash from lending company,” here. H/T pechanga.

Updated Materials in Agua Caliente Tax Matter — Updated 9/10/14

Here are the new materials in Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians v. Riverside County (C.D. Cal.):

42-1 Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

43 Agua Caliente Response

45 Defendants’ Reply

Prior materials here.

Update w/ additional materials:

34 order granting DWA intervention

46 order for supp. MJP briefing

ILPC to Present at the MSU Midwest Clinic Teachers Conference THIS SATURDAY at 10:30 am

Here is the registration page.

Here is the conference agenda.

California v. Miami Nation Enterprises: California SCT Materials (So Far)

Here:

California Petition for Review

Public Justice Amicus Brief in Support of Petition

MNE Answer to Petition

California Petition Stage Reply

California Opening Merits Brief

MNE Merits Brief

California Reply

California Supplemental Brief

Lower court materials here.

Complaint

Federal Court Denies Litigation Expenses Motion (Again?)

Here are the new materials in Cobell v. Jewell (D.D.C.):

4059 Emergency Motion

4061 Response

4062 Reply

4063 DCT Order

Prior order here.

Federal Court Enjoins Texas Hold ‘Em Poker at Coeur d’Alene Tribe

Here are the updated materials in State of Idaho v. Coeur d’Alene Tribe (D. Idaho):

33 Tribe Reply

35 DCT Order Staying Proceedings

40 DCT Order

An excerpt:

The Court has before it Defendant Coeur d’Alene Tribe’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 15) and Plaintiff the State of Idaho’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and for a Preliminary Injunction (Dkts. 3, 4). The Court previously stayed this lawsuit based on the Tribe’s argument that the parties had agreed to arbitrate this dispute. See June 23, 2014 Order, Dkt. 35. Afterward, the Tribe changed its mind and decided it would prefer to litigate. The Court will therefore address the pending motions. For the reasons expressed below, the Court will deny the Tribe’s motion to dismiss and grant the State’s motion for injunctive relief.

Prior materials here. H/t Pechanga.

Federal Court Dismisses Sand Creek Massacre Trust Accounting Claims

Here is the order in Flute v. United States (D. Colo.):

36 DCT Order

An excerpt:

In the absence of an enforceable trust, 25 U.S.C. §§ 162a(d) and 4044 do not impose a legally required duty necessary to establish a waiver of sovereign immunity under the APA. See Norton, 542 U.S. at 63–64. Furthermore, plaintiffs’ claims do not concern “losses to or mismanagement of trust funds” and thus do not fall within the 2009 DOI Appropriations Act. See Pub.L. No. 111–88, 123 Stat. at 2922. Finding that the United States has not waived sovereign immunity for this suit, the Court concludes that it lacks jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ claims and must dismiss them without prejudice. See Brereton v. Bountiful City Corp., 434 F.3d 1213, 1216 (10th Cir.2006) ( “[W]here the district court dismisses an action for lack of jurisdiction … the dismissal must be without prejudice.”).

Briefs here. Other materials here.

 

Federal Court Holds that Federal Indian Country Leasing Regs Preempt State Rental and Utility Taxes

Here are the materials in Seminole Tribe of Florida v. State of Florida (S.D. Fla.):

59 Seminole Motion for Summary J

61 Florida Motion for Summary J

66 Florida Response

68 Seminole Response

70 Florida Reply

71 Seminole Reply

84 DCT Order

An excerpt:

The Seminole Tribe of Florida filed this lawsuit challenging the imposition of two Florida taxes: the Rental Tax and the Utility Tax. After considering the extensive briefing by the parties, as well as hearing oral argument from each side, the Court finds that Federal law prohibits both taxes from being imposed.

Electoral Tribunal de Mexico

I’m presenting on Native voting and political rights before the Mexican electoral tribunal. My paper is here.

The Tribunal building

IMG_7398.JPG

IMG_7372.JPG

Anthropology museum

IMG_7306.JPG

The other American presenters

IMG_7386.JPG

I can’t read it very well but it seems as though the tribunal is using UNDRIP to interpret and apply Indigenous law in tribal elections.

IMG_7362.JPG