Here are the materials so far in James v. Kootenai County (D. Idaho):
32-1 Motion to Amend Complaint to Add Punitive Damages
46 DCT Order re Punitive Damages
News coverage:
Inlander: “Coeur d’Alene tribal members say their religious rights were violated in daughter’s untimely death“
Spokesman Review: “Coeur d’Alene Tribe member’s body returned to family”
Here are the materials in Whittle v. Zims Hot Springs (D. Idaho):
Here are the materials in Northwestern Band of the Shoshone Nation v. State of Idaho (D. Idaho):
Here is the complaint in Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. P4 Production LLC (D. Idaho):
Here are the materials in Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. Bernhardt (D.D.C.):
103-1 Tribe Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement
And here are related materials in Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation v. United States (D. Idaho):
Here:
Questions presented:
1. Whether the Ninth Circuit correctly holds that tribal jurisdiction over nonmembers is established whenever a Montana exception is met, or whether, as the Seventh and Eighth Circuits have held, a court must also determine that the exercise of such jurisdiction stems from the tribe’s inherent authority to set conditions on entry, preserve tribal self-government, or control internal relations.
2. Whether the Ninth Circuit has construed the Montana exceptions to swallow the general rule that tribes lack jurisdiction over nonmembers.
Lower court materials here.
Update:
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.