Ninth Circuit Affirms Conviction of Former Chukchansi CEO for Fraud and Theft from a Tribal Gaming Establishment

Here is the opinion in United States v. Livingston. An excerpt:

The panel affirmed convictions for mail fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1341) and theft by an officer or employee of a gaming establishment on Indian lands (18 U.S.C. § 1168(b)).

The panel held that the location of the gaming establishment is not an element of the offense under § 1168(b), and that the allegations in the indictment were sufficiently specific to apprise the defendant of the specific offenses with which he was charged.

The panel also held that the district court’s jury instructions correctly defined “intent to defraud,” and that the district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting prior acts evidence under Fed. R. Evid. 404(b).

Here are the materials:

Livingston Opening Brief

US Answer Brief

Livingston Reply

Lower court materials here, here, here, and here.

Jeff Livingston was also the gaming manager at Grand Traverse Band.

Ninth Circuit Briefs in EEOC v. Peabody Western Coal

Here:

EEOC Opening Brief

Federal Appellee Brief

Navajo Answer Brief

Peabody Coal Answer Brief

Reply TK EEOC Reply

Lower court materials here.

Federal Court Dismisses Amended Complaint in Spokane Tribal Member Trust Breach Case re: Uranium Mining

Here are the updated materials in Villegas v. United States (E.D. Wash.):

DCT Order Granting US Motion

US Motion

Villegas Response

US Reply

Prior materials are here and here.

Fourth Circuit Affirms Major Crimes Act Murder Conviction Arising on Eastern Band Cherokee Reservation

Here is the opinion in United States v. Lespier.

NYTs: New York Regulators Targeting Western Sky

Here. H/t Pechanga.

Federal Indictment of Sault Tribe Casino Cheaters

Here is the indictment in United States v. Koster (W.D. Mich.):

Koster et al Indictment

News coverage here.

Coverage and Commentary on Interior Buy Back Program

McLatchy

NPR

Interior

Galanda

Split Utah SCT Holds Navajo Man May Not Inherit from Adoptive Father

Here is the opinion in Estate of Hannifin.

An excerpt:

Max Hill, in his capacity as Special Representative of the Estate of William J. Hannifin, appeals from a district court order awarding Willis Nakai a portion of that estate. Though Nakai is neither biologically nor legally related to Hannifin, the district court determined that he was nonetheless entitled to inherit under the doctrine of equitable adoption.

We reverse. We hold that the doctrine of equitable adoption, first recognized in In re Williams’ Estates, 348 P.2d 683 (Utah 1960), has been preempted by the detailed provisions of Utah‘s Probate Code. See UTAH CODE §§ 75-1-101 to -8-101. And, because Nakai does not qualify under the Probate Code‘s intestate succession provisions, we reverse the decision entitling him to inherit from Hannifin.

Oral argument audio: Estate of William Hannifin 20111125 – Listen | Download

Review of Blake Watson’s “Buying America From the Indians”

Here.

H/t Legal History Blog.

Eighth Circuit Decides DISH Network Must Exhaust Tribal Court Remedies in Dispute at Turtle Mountain

Here is the opinion in DISH Network v. Laducer:

CA8 Opinion

Briefs are here.

Lower court materials are here.