Here are the materials, in a case involving actions of the Rosebud Sioux Tribe’s law enforcement as arresting officers:
us-response-to-erickson-motion-to-suppress
supplement-to-motion-to-suppress
Criminal
Adam Walsh Act Declared Unconstitutional
The district court for the Middle District of Florida dismissed an indictment under the Adam Walsh Act because Congress was unauthorized to enact the statute under the Interstate Commerce Clause. The case is United States v. Powers. Doubtful it would apply to Indian Country, but interesting nonetheless.
Update — Dec. 17, 2008 — This case, like one or two others, is likely an aberration. It is far more likely than not that the Adam Walsh Act is constitutional. For more information, see this website.
Ninth Circuit Affirms Constitutionality of Bald Eagle Protection Act
In consolidated cases, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the constitutionality of prosecuting American Indians under the Bald and Golden Eagles Protection Act, rejecting a challenge under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. A similar case is under review by the Tenth Circuit (United States v. Friday).
The Ninth Circuit applied a 2003 precedent, United States v. Antoine, upholding the law under similar facts. Here are the materials.
Cornelius v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue – Authority of Tribal Law Enforcement Off-Reservation
This case concerns a non-Indian’s driver license, which was suspended after failing a sobriety test at a checkpoint controlled jointly by state and tribal law enforcement, just outside the border of the Prairie Band Potawatomi reservation. Unluckily for the appellant, the state and the tribe had a law enforcement cooperative agreement.
Here is the opinion.
Here are the briefs:
American Indians and the Death Penalty
This site includes links to scholarship on the application of the death penalty to American Indians throughout American history (and earlier).
Native Americans and the Death Penalty
Thanks to Patrick O’Donnell.
Bob v. United States – Tort Claim Against Oglala Sioux Tribe Officers
The district court for the District of South Dakota dismissed this claim of police brutality by Oglala Sioux Tribe officers against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act. Turns out, the officers were not cross-deputized by the Bureau of Indian Affairs and therefore not law enforcement officers under the Act. Here are the materials:
Federal Plea Deal with Makah Whalers Falls Apart
From the Seattle Times:
TACOMA — A plea agreement expected from five Makah whalers this afternoon fell apart when the whalers realized that the U.S. government planned to restrict their future whale hunts.
Federal authorities expected the five tribal members who killed a gray whale during an unlicensed hunt last September to sign off on the plea — which would have kept the whalers from serving jail time.
Because they declined to take the plea deal, the whalers still face up to one year in custody, a $100,000 fine, up to five years of probation and possible community service. The five men will return to court Thursday with either a new plea agreement worked out or to make plans for the case to go to trial.
Cross-Deputization Concerns in Manistee
Glenn Zaring, Communications Director of the Little River Band of Ottawa Indians, recently wrote an article for the Ludington Daily News regarding the reluctance of Manistee County to cross-deputize and work cooperatively with LRB law enforcement. He poses some important questions in the article that highlight some of the divisive issues in the region
http://www.ludingtondailynews.com/news.php?story_id=39440#comments
EXCERPT:
For years now, the controversy over cross-deputization of tribal police officers in Michigan has been swirling here in Manistee County. Not in other areas, just here! The 11 other tribes in Michigan have good relations with their local law enforcement authorities and are cross-deputized. They are also integral components of the law enforcement picture protecting and serving all of their counties’ residents. County prosecutors and sheriffs welcome the assistance of tribal law enforcement officers in maintaining law and order and defraying the costs that would otherwise be borne exclusively by county taxpayers.
Why is Manistee County so far out of the mainstream? Why has Manistee County ignored the wishes of the U.S. Attorney General’s office to cross-deputize the officers of the Little River Band of Ottawa Indians? Why does the county believe the accepted and successful practice across the state of cross-deputizing tribal officers cannot work here? Why do the Manistee County Commissioners and sheriff want to ignore the opportunity to expand the abilities of law enforcement to serve all of the county residents — at no cost to the county?
Primeaux v. Dooley – Preemptory Striking of Indian Jurors
Here is the opinion from the South Dakota Supreme Court.
Like all the other cases on this subject, the court held that striking American Indians from the juror pool does not create enough racial disparity to justify reversal of a conviction of an American Indian. If Indians are too small a percentage of the general population in South Dakota, where would there ever be a violation?
Senate Indian Affairs Committee Field Hearing — Law Enforcement — Written Testimony
Panel 1
THE HONORABLE DIANE ENOS
President, Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community
Scottsdale, AZ
THE HONORABLE JOE SHIRLEY JR.
President, The Navajo Nation
Window Rock, AZ
THE HONORABLE DANIEL EDDY
Chairman, Colorado River Indian Tribes
Parker, AZ
Turtle Talk 
You must be logged in to post a comment.