Kumeyyay Repatriations Complaint against University of California

Here is the complaint in Kumeyyay Cultural Reparations Committee v. University of California (S.D. Cal.):

Kumeyyay

Assassin’s Creed 3 Video Game to Feature American Indian Assassin…

…developed with an American Indian consultant and voice actor.

Hmmm. Weird.

Here.

Grand Ronde Women Share Stories of Resilience

Story about the Willamette Heritage Exhibit (running from April 6th to May 28th ) is here.

WaPo Article on Jim Thorpe Burial Dispute

Here.

Ninth Circuit Rejects RFRA Money Claims in Hawaii-Based Native American Church Case Involving Marijuana

Here are the materials in today’s opinion in Oklevueha Native American Church v. Holder:

Oklevueha Opening Brief

US Appellee Brief

Oklevueha Reply Brief

CA9 Opinion

Lower court materials here.

N.D. Supreme Court Issues Opinions in Fighting Sioux Case

Here is the opinion.

News coverage here, via Pechanga.

From the coverage:

The North Dakota Supreme Court today declined to address the constitutional issue raised by the State Board of Higher Education, which claimed that a law requiring UND to keep the nickname improperly intrudes on the board’s authority.

A slim majority of the court was ready to take up the constitutional issue but was blocked by the opposition of two justices and the requirement that such decisions require the support of four of the court’s five members.

“There are not enough members of this court willing to decide the constitutional issue at this time,” Chief Justice Gerald VandeWalle wrote. “We therefore do not address the constitutional issue, and we decline to enjoin the secretary of state from placing the referendum measure on the June 2012 primary election ballot.”

Second Amended Complaint in Oglala Suit against Brewers and Whiteclay Distributors

Here.

More details here.

Via Pechanga.

New Book on Cherokee Syllabary

ICT has two articles on Ellen Cushman’s new book, The Cherokee Syllabary: Writing the People’s Perseverance.

Here is the interview with the author, and here is the review of the book.

Cushman, a Cherokee Nation citizen, writes in her preface about the questions generated by a poster of the Cherokee syllabary chart that hangs in her office. Visitors ask, “Why so many characters? How is this learned? Why these shapes? Where can I find samples of writing in Sequoyan? Is it even still used? What does it all mean?”

Cushman, wondering herself, set out to answer these and other queries. Her first few chapters detail the story of Sequoyah and how the writing system evolved from handwritten script to the printing press. Then the author delves into the deeper meaning of the syllabary itself. In theorizing about how the original handwritten script may have had many linguistic meanings built into its very shapes, she actually strips down the syllables digitally to their core shapes and creates a table comparing them. All this makes for a fascinating discussion.

The narrative then flows into how the script was later adapted to the printing press. Cushman notes that despite the influence of missionary groups, the final product was not informed by the English alphabet, even though some Cherokee syllables ended up resembling English alphabetic shapes. It was a Cherokee product from start to finish.

WSJ on the Grand Canyon Controversy

Here. Or just go to Google news and enter “hualapai grand canyon”.

An excerpt:

The legal battle is testing the limits of business partnerships between tribes and non-Indians and is pitting tribal government leaders against one another. At stake are future profits of the lucrative Skywalk and at least $10 million in profits that the bridge has accumulated—now locked in an escrow account while the tribe fights with Mr. Jin.

“Our business is being destroyed by a handful of self-interested [tribal] government officials who are stealing our business and trampling our rights” said Troy Eid, a lawyer for Mr. Jin and former U.S. attorney for Colorado.

The tribe argues that it is Mr. Jin who “makes a promise, breaks it, then changes his story,” said Paul Charlton, the tribe’s lawyer and former U.S. attorney in Arizona.

Materials in Challenge to Designation of New Mexico’s Mt. Taylor as Cultural Property

Here are the materials in Reyellen Resources Inc. v. New Mexico Cultural Properties Review Committee:

2011-02-04 Rayellen Resources v. NM CPRC dist ct dcn

2012-03-08 NMCA order certifying Mt. Taylor TCP to NMSC

An excerpt from the trial court opinion:

Petitioners, variolls surface and mineral owners, filed a First Amended Petition for Writ of Certiorari challenging the Respondents’ listing of “more than 700 square miles spanning portions of three New Mexico counties encompassing the entirely of Mt. Taylor–from its peak to its surrounding mesas–as a traditional cultural property on the New Mexico State Register of Cultural Properties.” Respondents herein are the New Mexico Cultural Properties Review Committee. Alan “Mac” Watson, individually and as Chairman oflhe Cultural Properties Review Committee and the Pueblo of Acoma, will be hereinafter collectively referred as “Respondents”. This Court granted certiorari and now reverses and remands tor the reasons stated below.