Neighbors of Casino San Pablo Complaint against Interior and NIGC re: Lytton Rancheria Gaming Dismissed

Here are the materials in Neighbors of Casino San Pablo v. Salazar (D. D.C.):

US Motion to Dismiss Neighbors Complaint

Lytton Rancheria Proposed Motion to Dismiss

DCT Order Dismissing Neighbors Complaint

Federal Court Denies TRO in Gaughan Gaming v. Tonkawa

Here is that order:

DCT Order Denying Gaughan Motion for TRO

And some additional materials:

Tonkawa Tribe Brief on Subject Matter Jurisdiction

Tonkawa Gaming Commission Brief on Subject Matter Jurisdiction

Here is Gaughan Gaming’s original filing.

Here are the federal court removal docs.

Detroit News Coverage of Bay Mills Casino Shutdown

What we don’t understand is why the State of Michigan is taking credit for this one, given that the heavy lifting in opposing the Vanderbilt casino was done by Little Traverse.

Here is the article. And a map from the article:

Continue reading

Pauma Band Gaming Compact Dispute Materials

Currently pending in district court is a motion for summary judgment by the Pauma Band in their long-running dispute with the State of California over revenue sharing and their compact terms.

Here are the most recent materials:

Pauma Band Motion for Summary J

California Opposition

Pauma Band Reply

This case is on remand from the Ninth Circuit (materials here).

Bay Mills Vanderbilt Casino Closed

Here is the news coverage. Thanks to A.K.

And here is the Freep coverage, thanks to B.C.

Federal Court Enjoins Bay Mills’ Vanderbilt Casino

Here is the order:

DCT Preliminary Injunction Order

Bay Mills has until noon to close its casino.

Ninth Circuit Briefing in Shingle Springs Miwok v. Caballero

Here:

Caballero Opening Brief

Shingle Springs Answer Brief

Caballero Reply Brief

Here is the issue, according to the tribe’s brief:

Appellee Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians (hereinafter, “Tribe”) has operated its federally recognized tribal government under the name “Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians” (the “Mark” or the “Tribe’s Mark”)[FN1] for over thirty years. During this time the Tribe provided governmental and educational services to its members and the public and its Mark became well known. Appellant Cesar Caballero is not a member of the Tribe, but identifies himself as a person of “Miwok” ancestry. In 2008, after he learned the Tribe planned to open a casino, he began to do business under the Tribe’s Mark and represent to third parties, through local and federal government filings, that he was the “Chief” and “Tribal Historian” of the “Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians.” These representations were false.

Staudenmaier and Khalsa have published an article on Carcieri and taking land into trust in UNLV Gaming Law Journal

The title is A post-Carcieri vocabulary exercise: what if “now” really means “then”? The cite is 1 UNLV Gaming L.J. 39 (2010).

UPDATE: The article is available here.

Tonkawa Notice of Removal to Federal Court in Gaming Management Co. Dispute

Here is the notice:

Tonkawa Notice of Removal to Federal Court

DCT Order Setting Hearing Date — March 28

The original state court materials are here.

Gaughan Gaming v. Tonkawa Tribe & Tonkawa Tribal Gaming Commission Materials (So Far)

Here:

Gaughan Gaming Petition for Injuntive Relief

Gaughan Gaming Motion for TRO

Kay County Dist Ct Order Setting Hearing