Here.
Washingtonian: “Getting to Know Obama Court Nominee Patricia Ann Millett”
Here.
Here.
Here.
Here.
Turtle Talk readers will of course recognize Patricia Millett, whose contributions to Indian law are well known.
Here.
Here.
Authored by:
Michael W. Cotter, U.S. Attorney, District of Montana
Calvin Wilson, Chief Prosecutor, Northern Cheyenne Tribal Court
Glen Littlebird, Sr., Prosecutor, Northern Cheyenne Tribal Court
This week the United States Department of Justice released a report to Congress entitled Indian Country Investigations and Prosecutions which provides a range of enforcement statistics required under the Tribal Law and Order Act of 2010. The report, based on data compiled from the case management system used by U.S. Attorney’s Offices (USAO) with Indian Country jurisdiction, and FBI crime data from reservations, shows among other things a 54 percent increase in Indian Country criminal prosecutions since Fiscal Year 2009.
Here in the District of Montana, justice in Indian Country is achieved through both tribal and federal courts. Currently, under the Indian Civil Rights Act, a tribal court’s authority to sentence a defendant is limited to a term of imprisonment of 1 year and a fine of $5000 per offense. Because tribal court penalties are limited, the most serious of crimes are prosecuted in federal court by the USAO. In Montana, the USAO shares prosecutorial responsibilities with tribal prosecutors on all of the reservations in the state, except the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Indian Reservation.
The Indian Country Investigations and Prosecutions report released this week by the Department of Justice previews a new era of partnership between the federal government and American Indian tribes. The report documents an unprecedented level of collaboration with tribal law enforcement, regular consultation on a crime fighting strategy, joint federal/tribal task forces, information sharing, training of investigators, and cross deputizing tribal police and prosecutors to enforce federal and tribal law. We certainly have seen the changes described by the report in the USAO’s relationships with its tribal partners in Montana.
Since 2010, the District of Montana USAO has implemented a bi-monthly meeting involving the federal prosecutors assigned to each reservation, the tribal prosecutors for the reservation and tribal and federal law enforcement officers. During these meetings, cases arising on a particular reservation during the preceding two-week period are discussed and a joint decision is made concerning which jurisdiction – Federal or tribal or both – will prosecute a particular case. Between 2010 and the present, the USAO in Montana has devoted six prosecutors to Indian Country. With these additional resources, over the last two years, 76% of all cases staffed have been resolved in either federal or tribal court. During the last two years, the Montana USAO has averaged 30 jury trials each year. Each of the approximately 60 trials involved violent crimes committed in Indian Country. In addition, numerous trials have occurred in tribal courts across Montana resulting in convictions of defendants that have committed less serious crimes.
Tribal courts play an integral role in providing public safety in our Indian communities. In Montana, federal and tribal prosecutors recognize and respect each other and the courts in which they work. Tribal courts, like tribal governments, are important federal partners. The members of federal law enforcement and the USAO Montana support partners in tribal law enforcement and the tribal court system, and vice versa. That is why federal prosecutors and agents share investigative files with their counterparts in Indian Country. Just as tribal law enforcement respond to federal court subpoenas, special agents from the FBI routinely respond to tribal court subpoenas to provide testimony in criminal proceedings and trials.
Tribal communities as a whole, and defendants as well as victims of crime in Indian country must have confidence that their tribal court systems are capable of delivering justice. When that confidence is lacking for whatever reason, the Department of Justice and the USAOs must do all we can to develop that confidence. The federal and tribal governments need a true partnership. It is only through this “court to court” relationship that justice truly may be achieved in Indian Country for victims of crimes. We agree that the process in place is way better than it has ever been before. It’s real. It’s working. It is also important to remember that often tribal court can provide quicker and better answers in various criminal matters.
Although it will take some time before we can understand the full impact of the recent efforts on crime in Indian Country, some things are clear. The increase in enforcement will bolster the faith and confidence that American Indian communities have in the criminal justice system. The increase in collaboration and communication strengthens the bond of trust between federal and tribal investigators, prosecutors, and other personnel in both federal and tribal criminal justice systems. Finally, the efforts undertaken in the last few years by the men and women of the federal and tribal criminal justice systems will make communities safer in Montana.
Michael W. Cotter was nominated by President Barack Obama to serve as the United States Attorney for the District of Montana. He was sworn in as Montana’s 39th United States Attorney on December 30, 2009.
Calvin Wilson has been licensed to practice law in the State of Montana since 1977. He is currently the Chief Prosecutor for the Northern Cheyenne Tribal Court. He has also served as a tribal judge, a tribal attorney, an elected Country Attorney for Big Horn County and a prosecutor for the City of Hardin.
Glen Littlebird, Sr., who is also a prosecutor for Northern Cheyenne Tribal Court, has served as a special agent for the BIA, a tribal judge, and a tribal councilman.
Report to Congress is Requirement under the Tribal Law and Order Act of 2010
WASHINGTON – The Department of Justice released today a report to Congress entitled Indian Country Investigations and Prosecutions which provides a range of enforcement statistics required under the Tribal Law and Order Act of 2010. The report, based on data compiled from the case management system used by U.S. Attorney’s Offices (USAO) with Indian Country jurisdiction shows among other things a 54 percent increase in Indian Country criminal prosecutions since Fiscal Year 2009.
“Across the country, U.S. Attorneys have been focused on fighting crime in Indian Country and reinforcing the bond between federal and tribal law enforcement, which also strengthens the faith that people have in their criminal justice system,” said Attorney General Eric Holder. “This report on federal law enforcement efforts in Indian Country is beginning to show the fruits of this labor with an increase in Indian Country cases prosecuted in federal courts over the past three years, but we have more work to do. The department will continue in its commitment to working with our tribal partners to build safe, sustainable, and healthy communities in American Indian and Alaska Native communities.”
“Every day, the men and women from U.S. Attorney’s Offices who prosecute violent crimes in Indian Country work hard to improve public safety in those communities,” said Timothy Purdon, U.S. Attorney for the District of North Dakota and Chairman of the Attorney General’s Advisory Subcommittee on Native American Issues. “The notable increase in prosecutions of Indian Country crime described in this report are the result of the many initiatives led by U.S. Attorney’s Offices across the country, including community prosecution strategies that place federal prosecutors on the reservations on a frequent basis to enhance criminal investigations and communication, and Tribal Special Assistant U.S. Attorney programs that have enhanced coordination with cross-deputized tribal prosecutors. These efforts and the resulting increase in prosecutions are a testament to the Justice Department’s commitment to public safety in Indian Country and they are an encouraging step toward safer, stronger native communities.”
“The FBI has a sustained commitment to enhancing public safety in Indian Country,” said FBI Assistant Director Ron Hosko. “As this report demonstrates our investigative strategy is focused on fully leveraging vital partnerships with federal, state, local and tribal agencies to address violent crime and victimization in tribal communities. This approach not only produces investigative results in the short term but also develops the trust and collaboration necessary to ensure sustained enhancements to public safety in the long term.”
The information contained in the report shows the following:
• The Justice Department’s prioritization of Indian country crime has resulted in a notable increase in commitment to overall law enforcement efforts in Indian country. Caseloads have increased overall from 1,091 cases filed in fiscal year (FY) 2009 to 1,138 in FY 2010 to 1,547 in FY 2011 to 1,677 in FY 2012. This represents a nearly 54 percent increase in the Indian country crime caseload.
• USAO data for calendar year (CY) 2011 indicate that just under 37 percent (1,041) of all Indian Country submissions for prosecution (2,840) were declined by USAOs. In CY 2012, USAOs declined approximately 31 percent (965) of all (3,145) Indian Country submissions for prosecution. Overall, a substantial majority of Indian Country criminal cases opened by USAOs were prosecuted.
• The most common reasons for declination by USAOs were insufficient evidence (61 percent in CY 2011 and 52 percent in CY 2012) and referral to another prosecuting authority (19 percent in CY 2011 and 24 percent in CY 2012).
• The most common reasons investigations during calendar years CY 2011 and 2012 were not referred included deaths determined to be due to non-criminal causes (e.g., natural causes, accidents, suicides) and allegations in which there was insufficient evidence to prove criminal activity.
•The report shows a new era of partnership between the federal government and American Indian tribes, including an unprecedented level of collaboration with tribal law enforcement. The increase in collaboration and communication strengthens the bond of trust between federal and tribal investigators, prosecutors, and other personnel in both federal and tribal criminal justice systems, and it will make communities safer as a result.
Read the entire report at www.justice.gov/tribal/tloa-report-cy-2011-2012.pdf
Read about the Justice Department’s efforts to increase public safety in Indian County at http://www.justice.gov/tribal/accomplishments.html
Final vote was 16 for, 13 against.
Here.
An excerpt:
In many ways, the German association is drawing on the experiences of museums in Britain and the United States, which started facing claims for the repatriation of human remains decades ago. The Smithsonian began to repatriate American Indian bones in the late 1980s, and in 1990 the United States passed legislation to enforce the return of those remains by museums that benefit from federal funds. The Smithsonian independently returned remains to Australia in 2008 and 2010.
However, a report in 2011 from the Government Accountability Office still urged new measures to speed up the Smithsonian’s work, because by then it had returned only 5,000 remains, about one-third of its collection of such material.
See Press Release here.
Excerpt:
Today, Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs Kevin K. Washburn issued for public comment a proposed rule designed to demonstrate the Administration’s commitment to restoring tribal homelands and furthering economic development on Indian reservations. The proposed rule will provide for greater notice of land-into-trust decisions and clarify the mechanisms for judicial review depending on whether the land is taken into trust by the Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs, or by an official of the Bureau of Indian Affairs.During the public comment window, Indian Affairs will also conduct tribal consultation.
For the Bureau of Indian Affairs trust acquisition decisions, which are generally for non-gaming purposes and constitute the vast majority of land-into-trust decisions, the proposed rule will ensure that parties have adequate notice of the action and clarifies the requirement that exhaustion of administrative remedies within the Department is necessary to seek judicial review.
“The principal purpose of this proposed rule is to provide greater certainty to tribes in their ability to develop lands acquired in trust for purposes such as housing, schools and economic development,” said Assistant Secretary Washburn. “For such acquisitions, the proposed rule will create a ‘speak now or forever hold your peace moment’ in the land-into-trust process. If parties do not appeal the decision within the administrative appeal period, tribes will have the peace of mind to begin development without fear that the decision will be later overturned.”
Update from Interior:
Since the Obama Administration took office in January of 2009, the Department has approved more than 1175 applications for land into trust, including 12 for Indian Gaming, and the total acquisitions include more than 205,000 acres.
You must be logged in to post a comment.