New Scholarship on Hopi Religious Freedom and Cultural Property

Here, from the Maryland Journal of International Law:

 

 

New Volume of Indigenous Peoples’ Journal of Law, Culture & Resistance

Here:

Current Issue, Volume 4, Issue 1, 2017

Front Matter

Front Matter

Contents

Editorial

Letter from the Editor
Anter, Simone

Illustration

“Water is Life” Editoon
Two Bulls, Marty Sr.

Photography

Oceti Sakowin Camp
Hewitt, Cathy

Gallery I
Wilson, Rob

Articles

Environmentalism and Human Rights Legal Framework: The Continued Frontier of Indigenous Resistance
Thompson, Geneva E. B.

Photography Continued

Gallery II
Wilson, Rob

Poetry

White Man’s Elixir
Kuauhtzin, Tekpatl Tonalyohlotl

Current Issue of American Indian Law Review (Vol. 41, No. 1)

Here:

Vol. 41, No. 1 (2016-2017)

Click any link to view in PDF format  

Article

Capital, Inequality, and Self-Determination: Creating a Sovereign Financial System for Native American Nations – W. Gregory Guedel, Ph.D and J. D. Colbert

Comments

Why Indigenous Peoples’ Property Rights Matter: Why the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples May Be Used to Condemn Isis and the State of Iraq for Their Failure to Protect the Property Rights of Indigenous Peoples in the Nineveh Plains – Brooke E. Hamilton

Defending the Cobell Buy-Back Program – Rebekah Martin

Intellectual Property Rights and Informed Consent in American Indian Communities: Legal and Ethical Issues– Naomi Palosaari

Raising Capital in Indian Country – Evan Way
Note

Christman v. Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde: A Chapter in the Disenrollment Epidemic – Tabitha Minke


Special Features

The Dynamic Legal Environment of Daily Fantasy Sports – Elizabeth Lohah Homer

Trespass to Culture: The Bioethics of Indigenous Populations’ Informed Consent in Mainstream Genetic Research Paradigms – Alexandra Winters 

Harvard Law Review Indian Law Commentary Series by Kevin Washburn and Angela Riley

Here:

What the Future Holds: The Changing Landscape of Federal Indian Policy

Indian Law Commentary Series

Essay by

Native Nations and the Constitution: An Inquiry into “Extra-Constitutionality”

Indian Law Commentary Series

Essay by

Michael Blumm on the Treaty Right to a Habitat

Michael Blumm has published “Indian Treaty Fishing Rights and the Environment: Affirming the Right to Habitat Protection and Restoration” in the Washington Law Review.

WaPo: “If Gorsuch is like his colleagues, he’ll constantly interrupt the female justices”

Here.

The empirical research backing this claim is here.

Federal Lawyer Indian Law Issue 2017

Here:

The Rapidly Increasing Extraction of Oil, and Native Women, in North Dakota
During the past year, the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and allies made national news as they gathered in prayerful ceremony at the confluence of the Missouri and Cannonball Rivers to stop the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline project in North Dakota. The pipeline threatens the tribe’s drinking water, sacred sites, and burial grounds, and, as a result, much attention has been paid to the potential environmental and cultural impacts of the pipeline. Little to no focus, however, has been given to the proposed pipeline’s impacts on the safety of Native women and children living in the Bakken region of North Dakota.
Statutory Divestiture of Tribal Sovereignty
The Supreme Court’s non-decision in Dollar General v. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians is evidence not only of disagreement on tribal civil jurisdiction but perhaps also uncertainty in how to analyze divestiture of tribal sovereignty. Most scholars (including myself) have described the Court’s behavior in tribal sovereign authority cases as one of judicial supremacy, in that the Court merely makes policy choices based on its own ideological views of tribal power.
Breaking Faith With the Tribal Sovereignty Doctrine
The great Seneca Nation leader and diplomat Red Jacket is said to have illustrated the tribe’s frustration with the insatiable encroachment of those seeking Seneca lands during a negotiation with the Holland Land Company’s agent, Joseph Ellicott. The two were seated on a log.
Tribes and Cannabis: Seeking Parity with States and Consultation and Agreement from the U.S. Government
Sales of legal cannabis reached nearly $7 billion in 2016 and are expected to eclipse $20 billion by 2021. Despite their efforts, and an overarching trust obligation owed by the U.S. government to Indian nations, American Indian tribes adopting state “go-it-alone” models of cannabis legalization have failed to receive parity in treatment with states on cannabis issues and have been met with threats or actions by law enforcement.

Michelle Bryan on Sacred Water within Prior Appropriation

Michelle Bryan has posted “Valuing Tribal Sacred Water within Prior Appropriation,” published in the Natural Resources Journal. Here is an excerpt from the abstract:

Much has been written in the area of waters to support fishing rights under treaty. This article does not address these rights, but rather focuses on the sacred nature of the water resource itself. While the two may be complementary, a sacred water use may also exist separate from a recognized treaty fishing right. There are other places where these values should further be reflected, such as federal lands management plans, local land development codes, and environmental assessment review. This piece, however, will focus on the notable absence of sacred value within prior appropriation. This shift is important not only for the legal protections it might afford, but just as importantly as a signal that our water laws can stretch to protect the many interests of our time.

Richard Hughes on Pueblo Water Rights

Richard W. Hughes has published “Pueblo Indian Water Rights: Charting the Unknown” in the Natural Resources Journal, Winter 2017.

Here is the abstract:

This article examines the so-far-unsuccessful efforts to judicially define and quantify the water rights appurtenant to the core land holdings of the 19 New Mexico Pueblos, many of whose lands straddle the Rio Grande. It explains that the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals has squarely held that Pueblo water rights are governed by federal, not state law, and are prior to those of any non-Indian appropriator, but also that the Tenth Circuit acknowledged that it could not say how those rights should be characterized. Part I of the article examines the course of the cases that have sought to achieve this elusive goal. Of the first six cases, filed half a century ago, three ended in negotiated settlements and none of them has yielded a definitive ruling on the nature or measure of Pueblo rights. Of the three cases filed since then, only one is in active litigation on the Pueblo rights issue, but that case may finally lead to a substantive ruling. Part II discusses the few rulings that have been issued in these cases so far relative to Pueblo water rights, and examines the distinctive nature of the issues that are presented by the unique circumstances of the Pueblos’ history and landholdings. The article notes that the ultimate determination of the nature and measure of Pueblo rights could have dramatic consequences for any effort to adjudicate rights on the mainstem of the Upper and Middle Rio Grande.

New Article on Structural Racism and Court Appointed Special Advocates

If you sat in on a class I taught last week, you’d know this is my new favorite article:

Here.

This paper turns attention away from discussions of the race and economic poverty of the families most affected by the system, and instead looks at the impact of the race and privilege of these volunteer child advocates on child welfare decision-making

Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) are volunteers appointed by the court in child welfare cases to argue for a child’s best interests. There are many issues with this system, and I have been in many loud arguments about it (some of you have witnessed them). This article identifies many of those concerns and grounds them in the history of state child welfare systems–including how those systems affect Indian children.

As a side note, I know people personally who have worked hard to develop Tribal CASA programs. Those programs are particularly sensitive to ensuring their volunteers understand the culture of the tribe and their children, which counters the issues inherent in state systems. This article is specifically discussing the issue of CASAs in state systems.