Here is the unpublished opinion in Mastro v. Seminole Tribe:
Briefs here.
Here is the opinion in State ex rel. Swanson v. CashCall Inc.:
An excerpt:
Respondent State of Minnesota brought a consumer-enforcement action against appellants CashCall, Inc., and WS Funding, LLC, in July 2013, alleging that appellants are using a third company, Western Sky Financial, LLC, as a front to make usurious loans to Minnesota consumers. The state moved for a temporary injunction, and appellants moved to dismiss the state’s complaint pursuant to Minnesota Rule of Civil Procedure 12.02(e). The district court granted the temporary injunction and denied the dismissal motion. Appellants challenged both rulings in these consolidated appeals. Because the district court did not err by denying the dismissal motion and did not abuse its discretion by granting the temporary injunction, we affirm.
Here is the opinion in South v. Lujan:
An excerpt:
Plaintiff-Appellant Tiffany South—a former officer with the Sandia Pueblo Police Department (Plaintiff) filed a complaint for violation of the New Mexico Human Rights Act (NMHRA), retaliatory discharge, and tortious inference with contract against Defendants-Appellees Isaac Lujan, William Duran, and Mary-Alice Brogdon (collectively, Defendants) in their individual capacities. The district court granted Appellees’ motion to dismiss based on lack of jurisdiction. Because the record on appeal is insufficient to permit review, we reverse and remand for factual development on the issues relevant to state court jurisdiction.
Here is the complaint in State of New Mexico v. Jewell (D. N.M.):
Here are the materials in Pueblo of Pojoaque v. State of New Mexico (D. N.M.) referenced in the complaint:
11 Pueblo of Pojoaque Motion for Default Judgment
15 New Mexico Response to Motion for Default Judgment
18 Pueblo of Pojoaque Response
21 DCT Order Setting Aside Default Judgment
We posted the complaint in that case here.
Here are the briefs in Cosentino v. Pechanga Band of Luiseño Mission Indians:
Repky brief TK
Lower court materials (C.D. Cal.):
Here are the materials in Jamul Action Committee v. Stevens (E.D. Cal.):
22 Jamul Indian Village Motion to Fiile Amicus Brief
22-1 Jamul Indian Village Motion to Dismiss
30 Jamul Action Committee Response to Jamul Indian Village
31 Jamul Action Committee Response to Feds
34 Jamul Indian Village Reply in Support of Amicus Motion
36 Jamul Indian Village Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss
42-1 Jamul Action Committee Motion to Amend Complaint
We posted the complaint here.
Here are the materials in Grondal v. United States (E.D. Wash.):
275 Colville Motion to Dismiss
279 DCT Order re Supplemental Memorandums
308 DCT Order re Additional Supplemental Briefing
312 Plaintiffs Supplemental Briefing
315 Wapato Heritage Supplemental Briefing
316 Colville Supplemental Briefing
Here are the materials in Burley v. OneWest Bank (E.D. Cal.):
And here are materials in the related matter, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Burley (E.D. Cal.):
You must be logged in to post a comment.