From HuffPo, here.
Bruce Fein on NYs Strategy against Tribal Payday Lenders
From HuffPo, here.
From HuffPo, here.
Here is the opinion in United Planners Financial Services of America v. Sac and Fox Nation:
An excerpt:
There is nothing in the record indicating that the Business Committee met, voted, and approved by resolution or otherwise any specific arbitration clause with Broker or approved any broker agreement, by reference to a specific agreement, which contained an arbitration clause. We do not find any error with the District Court’s finding that authorized representatives of the Nation did execute the broker agreements with Broker. This is because certain officials of the Nation were authorized by resolution to “sell, assign and endorse for transfer, certificates representing stocks, bonds, or other securities now registered or hereafter registered in the name of this corporation.” (App. Rec. at 85-88). But this general approval to engage in broker activities does not rise to the level of an express approval of any arbitration clause or waiver of tribal sovereign immunity. Thus, while we find that the broker agreements were validly approved by the Nation, we do not find valid approval of the arbitration clause that would subject the Nation to be compelled to arbitrate.
Here is the order in Harrison v. Robinson Rancheria Band of Pomo Indians Business Council (N.D. Cal.):
DCT Order Dismissing Complaint wo Prejudice
Briefs are here.
Complaint is here.
Here are the materials in Corporate Commission of the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe Indians v. Money Centers of America (D. Minn.):
155 Baena Advisors Motion to Dismiss
160 Real Estate Empowered Motion to Dismiss
169 Mille Lacs Motion for Summary J
180 Mille Lacs Opposition to 160
181 Mille Lacs Opposition to MCA Motions
182 MCA Opposition to Mille Lacs Motion
185 MCA Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss
186 MCA Reply in Support of Motion for Summary J
199 Melanie Banjamin Motion to Quash
205 MCA Opposition to Motion to Quash
211 MJ Order Granting Motion to Quash
240 DCT Order re Motion to Dismiss
241 MJ Order re Motion to Compel
Prior materials here.
Here are the materials in Sears v. Gila River Indian Community (D. Ariz.):
Here are the updated materials:
155 Miccosuke Response to Motion to Strike
281 DCT Order Granting Motion to Strike
282 DCT Order Dismissing Complaint
An excerpt:
“No one fights dirtier or more brutally than blood; only family knows its own weaknesses, the exact placement of the heart.” Whitney Otto, How to Make an American Quilt (1991). Whitney Otto’s quote seems a particularly apt description of the emotionally and politically charged litigation, occurring in multiple judicial venues, between the named parties, whom include the following.
Motions to dismiss were here.
Miccosukee’s responses were here.
Second amended complaint here.
Here:
Petition for review briefs here.
Arizona COA materials here and here.
Trial court materials here:
Here is the opinion in Sheffer v. Buffalo Run Casino.
From the court’s syllabus:
Charles Sheffer, Jennifer Sheffer, and their minor son, J.S., were injured when their 18-wheeler tractor trailer collided with a rental vehicle leased to William Garris and driven by David Billups, both employees of Carolina Forge Company, L.L.C. Plaintiffs sued Carolina Forge on theories of respondeat superior and negligent entrustment. They also sued the Buffalo Run Casino, the Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma, and PTE, Inc. for dram-shop liability. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Carolina Forge, finding as a matter of law Carolina Forge was not liable for its employees’ actions under a theory of respondeat superior and did not negligently entrust the rental vehicle to its employees. The trial court also dismissed, sua sponte, the Buffalo Run Casino, PTE, Inc., and the Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma, determining that injunctions issued by the Honorable Lee R. West in the Western District of Oklahoma in Case No. 10-CV-00050-W and Case No. 10-CV-01339-W, prohibited suit for any tort claims against a tribe or a tribal entity. Plaintiffs appealed both orders, and we retained the appeals. In Sheffer v. Carolina Forge Co., 2013 OK 48, 306 P.3d 544, we reversed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Carolina Forge and found issues of material fact precluded summary judgment on both the respondeat superior and negligent entrustment claims. In the present case, we find the Peoria Tribe is immune from suit in state court for compact-based tort claims because Oklahoma state courts are not courts of competent jurisdiction as the term is used in the model gaming compact. We also hold that because Congress has not expressly abrogated tribal immunity from private, state court dram-shop claims and because the Peoria Tribe and its entities did not expressly waive their sovereign immunity by applying for and receiving a liquor license from the State of Oklahoma, the tribe is immune from dram-shop liability in state court. The trial court’s dismissal of the Peoria Tribe and its entities is affirmed.
You must be logged in to post a comment.