Here are the materials in Penobscot Nation v. Frey.
Here are the materials in in Klickitat County v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation.

Here:
Questions presented:

Lower court materials here.
Amicus briefs in support of the petition:
Here:
Questions presented:
Whether a federal court may force a non-consenting, non-Indian plaintiff to exhaust his claims in tribal court when the defendant tribe has expressly consented by contract to federal or state court jurisdiction and waived both sov- ereign immunity and tribal exhaustion.
Whether a state court may adjudicate a contractual dispute between a tribe and a non-Indian where the tribe has provided specific contrac- tual consent to state court jurisdiction; or in- stead, whether the Constitution or laws of the United States prohibit such exercises of state court jurisdiction unless the State has assumed general civil jurisdiction over tribal territory under Sections 1322 and 1326 of Title 25.

Lower court materials here.
Update:
Here:
Lower court materials here.

Questions presented:
Here is Monday’s order list.
The Court denied cert in Caballero v. United States, lower court materials here.
The tribe described an earlier incarnation of this case as “sovereign identity theft.”

Here is today’s order list.
The Court denied Samish v. Washington, an effort by the tribe to assert treaty rights, and Hawkins v. Haaland, a challenge to the Klamath Tribes’ regulation of the Klamath River.

Here.

Here.
Blurb: “Leah recaps Denezpi v. United States, an important case about tribal sovereignty, with Matthew Fletcher(Michigan State University & Chief Justice of the Pokagon band of Potawatomi Indians Court of Appeals) & April Youpee-Roll (Munger Tolles & Olson), which may involve … Neil Gorsuch’s heel turn in Indian law?!?”

You must be logged in to post a comment.