Criminal and Civil Justice Conference at Eastern Michigan Univ. — May 3, 2014

Here.

Speakers include Judge Tim Connors, Judge Allie Maldonado, and Judge Bill Thorne! A veritable who’s who of Michigan tribal judges.

 

Opening Appellate Brief in Lomeli v. Kelly — Contempt Matter in Nooksack Disenrollment Dispute

Here:

Lomeli v Kelly COA Opening Brief re Contempt of Court

Lower court order here.

News Coverage of Alaska Legislative Hearing on ILOC Report

Here. Quotes from tribal judge David Voluck:

“One of the courts I work for issues something as controversial as child support orders, for children in need,” Voluck said, a touch of sarcasm in his voice. “We’re not locking up white people, I don’t have an electric chair, I’m not doing anything that’s frightening. I’m not taxing, I’m not zoning, it has nothing to do with land and everything to do with Native children.”

“Your state is battling us tooth and nail and we are now in the Supreme Court over whether it’s kosher for me to issue a child support order for a tribal child. This, ladies and gentlemen of this committee, I posit is a grave waste of your resources.”

Federal Court Orders Exhaustion in Heldt v. Payday Financial

Here are the updated materials in Heldt v. Payday Financial LLC (D.S.D.):

36 Opposition to Motion to Compel Arbitration

46 Opposition to Motion to Stay

51 Opposition to Motion to Dismiss

56 Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss

58 DCT Order on Exhaustion

An excerpt:

ORDERED that Defendants, as the parties asserting that there is tribal court jurisdiction and that there ought to be tribal court exhaustion, must file within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order a declaratory judgment action in the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribal Court naming the Plaintiffs herein to address to that court the issue of tribal court jurisdiction and if that court concludes it has jurisdiction, and the availability of an arbitration forum as specified in the loan agreements in this case. In such a tribal court action, Plaintiffs of course may contest tribal court jurisdiction and assert their arguments as the unavailability of an arbitration forum as specified in the agreements without waiving their assertion that there is no tribal court jurisdiction. It is finally

ORDERED that the parties keep this Court advised of proceedings in the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribal Court by filing upon the conclusion of any tribal court proceedings and/or appeals, all pleadings filed by any party and all rulings by the tribal court as an attachment to an affidavit or stipulation.

Prior materials are here, here, and here.

Eighth Circuit Decides Tribal Court Exhaustion Appeal — Colombe v. Rosebud Sioux

Here is the opinion.

Briefs and lower court materials here.

Conference Announcement: “No Justice Without Peace: 3rd Biennial Gathering of Peacemakers”

The Tribal Judicial Institute, in collaboration with the Chickasaw Nation, FVTC, NTJC and NARF, will be hosting No Justice Without Peace: 3rd Biennial Gathering of Peacemakers at the Artesian Hotel in Sulphur, OK on April 22-24, This conference will introduce participants to indigenous justice methodologies and examples of how such methodologies are being incorporated into tribal justice systems. Highlights of the event include:

Tuesday April 22 – PRE–CONFERENCE
• DOJ/BIA Pre-conference Listening Session Regarding Peacemaking
• Peacemaking Initiative: Feedback Session
Wednesday April 23-24- MAIN CONFERENCE
• Peace and Justice Between World Views
• Roundtable Discussion on the Depth pf Peacemaking and Importance of Process
• Victimization to Criminality: How the Cycle of Injustice Continues
• Preparing te Next Generation of Peacemakers through Academia
• Positive Aspects of Peacemaking in Tribal Communities
• Peacemaking Programs at Work in Tribal Nations
• Child Protection Programs and Peacemaking
• Matriarchal Nature of Justice and Peacemaking
• Specialty Courts Using the Peacemaking Model
• Peacemaking in the Court
• Integrated Justice Models
Targeted Audience: Tribal Leaders, Tribal Judges, Peacemakers, Tribal Court Planners, Tribal Prosecutors, Tribal Attorneys and Tribal Justice System Officials. We also welcome practitioners from Federal and State justice systems who may be providing services to tribal communities and tribal members.

REGISTRATION:
There is no fee for registration.
PLEASE VISIT http://www.law.und.edu/tji/events.cfm TO REGISTER

LODGING:
PLEASE CONTACT THE ARTESIAN HOTEL @ 1-855-455-5255 to reserve a room.
A room block has been set up under the Peacemakers Gathering
There is a special conference rate of $83.00/ night plus taxes and fees.
The Room Block expires when filled or no later than April 11, 2014 so be sure to reserve your room quickly.
Presented by the Tribal Judicial Institute of the University of North Dakota, with a grant from the Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, and the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA). For questions, contact Lynnette at 701-777-6306 orlynnette.morin@ad.ndus.edu
This training is being hosted in collaboration with the host Chickasaw Nation; National Judicial College; Fox Valley Technical College; and NARF

Update in Caddo Leadership Dispute; Federal Court Denies TRO

Here are the new materials in Caddo Nation of Oklahoma v. Court of Indian Offenses for the Anadarko Agency (W.D. Okla.):

10 Plaintiff Supplemental Brief

13 Defendant Response

17 DCT Order Denying TRO

Earlier materials are here.

Nooksack Disenrollments under Resolution 13-111 Enjoined

Here:

Roberts v Kelly Order Permanently Enjoining Disenrollment Proceedings

COA materials here.

Federal Court Holds Little River Band Cannot Prosecute Tribal Member Crimes on Tribe-Owned Fee Land Outside of Indian Country

Here are the materials in Kelsey v. Pope (W.D. Mich.):

1 Kelsey Habeas Petition

13 LRB Response to Habeas Petition

16 Kelsey Reply

30 LRB Supplemental Memorandum

31 Kelsey Response

35 MJ R&R

36 LRB Objection

39 Kelsey Reply

41 DCT Order

Updated and Complete Summary Judgment Briefs in Cherokee Freedman Case

Here are the materials in Cherokee Nation v. Nash (D.D.C.):

233 Cherokee Nation Brief

234 Federal Defendants – Expert Report in Support of Partial Summary Judgment

Exhibit 3 Federal Defendants Motion and Memo In Support – Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Opposition to Cherokee Motion

235-1 Cherokee Freedmen Brief

235-3 Exhibits

239 Cherokee Nation Reply

243 Federal Defendants’ Reply to Cherokee Opposition to Cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment

243-1 Ex 1 to Federal Reply Brief

243-2 Ex 2 to Federal Reply Brief

244 Cherokee Freedmen Reply

Oral argument set for April 28, 2014.